From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx110.postini.com [74.125.245.110]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 210126B0005 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:07:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from /spool/local by e9.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:07:32 -0500 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by d01dlp01.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C639238C8047 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:07:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r0SH7TF7260896 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:07:29 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r0SH7Mv3015572 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:07:25 -0500 Message-ID: <5106B03E.6070302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:07:10 -0600 From: Seth Jennings MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: zsmalloc: various cleanups/improvments References: <1359135978-15119-1-git-send-email-sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130128034740.GE3321@blaptop> In-Reply-To: <20130128034740.GE3321@blaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Dan Magenheimer , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Nitin Gupta , Robert Jennings , linux-mm@kvack.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/27/2013 09:47 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Seth, > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46:14AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote: >> These patches are the first 4 patches of the zswap patchset I >> sent out previously. Some recent commits to zsmalloc and >> zcache in staging-next forced a rebase. While I was at it, Nitin >> (zsmalloc maintainer) requested I break these 4 patches out from >> the zswap patchset, since they stand on their own. > > [2/4] and [4/4] is okay to merge current zsmalloc in staging but > [1/4] and [3/4] is dependent on zswap so it should be part of > zswap patchset. Just to clarify, patches 1 and 3 are _not_ dependent on zswap. They just introduce changes that are only needed by zswap. Seth -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org