From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
Dave Shrinnker <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] memcg targeted shrinking
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:42:02 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511E10FA.2040708@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xr93ip5unz52.fsf@gthelen.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 02/15/2013 05:28 AM, Greg Thelen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> This patchset implements targeted shrinking for memcg when kmem limits are
>> present. So far, we've been accounting kernel objects but failing allocations
>> when short of memory. This is because our only option would be to call the
>> global shrinker, depleting objects from all caches and breaking isolation.
>>
>> This patchset builds upon the recent work from David Chinner
>> (http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-11/msg00643.html) to implement NUMA
>> aware per-node LRUs. I build heavily on its API, and its presence is implied.
>>
>> The main idea is to associate per-memcg lists with each of the LRUs. The main
>> LRU still provides a single entry point and when adding or removing an element
>> from the LRU, we use the page information to figure out which memcg it belongs
>> to and relay it to the right list.
>>
>> This patchset is still not perfect, and some uses cases still need to be
>> dealt with. But I wanted to get this out in the open sooner rather than
>> later. In particular, I have the following (noncomprehensive) todo list:
>>
>> TODO:
>> * shrink dead memcgs when global pressure kicks in.
>> * balance global reclaim among memcgs.
>> * improve testing and reliability (I am still seeing some stalls in some cases)
>
> Do you have a git tree with these changes so I can see Dave's numa LRUs
> plus these changes?
>
I've just uploaded the exact same thing I have sent here to:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/glommer/memcg.git
The branch is kmemcg-lru-shrinker. Note that there is also another
branch kmemcg-shrinker that contains some other simple patches that were
not yet taken and are more stable. I eventually have to merge the two.
I also still need to incorporate the feedback from you and Kame into
that. I will be traveling until next Wednesday, so expect changes in
there around Thursday.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-15 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 13:07 [PATCH 0/7] memcg targeted shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/7] vmscan: also shrink slab in memcg pressure Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 1:27 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 10:46 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 8:37 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-02-15 10:30 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/7] memcg,list_lru: duplicate LRUs upon kmemcg creation Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 1:31 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 10:54 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-20 7:46 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 9:21 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-02-15 10:36 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/7] lru: add an element to a memcg list Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 1:32 ` Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 10:57 ` Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] list_lru: also include memcg lists in counts and scans Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] list_lru: per-memcg walks Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 6/7] super: targeted memcg reclaim Glauber Costa
2013-02-08 13:07 ` [PATCH 7/7] memcg: per-memcg kmem shrinking Glauber Costa
2013-02-15 1:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] memcg targeted shrinking Greg Thelen
2013-02-15 10:42 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511E10FA.2040708@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).