From: Ric Mason <ric.masonn@gmail.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ksm: treat unstable nid like in stable tree
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:13:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51271A7D.6020305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1302210019390.17843@eggly.anvils>
On 02/21/2013 04:20 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> An inconsistency emerged in reviewing the NUMA node changes to KSM:
> when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in a stable tree, we say
> that it's okay for comparisons, but not as a leaf for merging; whereas
> when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in an unstable tree, we
> bail out immediately.
IIUC
- ksm page from the wrong NUMA node will be add to current node's stable
tree
- normal page from the wrong NUMA node will be merged to current node's
stable tree <- where I miss here? I didn't see any special handling in
function stable_tree_search for this case.
- normal page from the wrong NUMA node will compare but not as a leaf
for merging after the patch
>
> Now, it might be that a wrong NUMA node in an unstable tree is more
> likely to correlate with instablility (different content, with rbnode
> now misplaced) than page migration; but even so, we are accustomed to
> instablility in the unstable tree.
>
> Without strong evidence for which strategy is generally better, I'd
> rather be consistent with what's done in the stable tree: accept a page
> from the wrong NUMA node for comparison, but not as a leaf for merging.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> ---
> mm/ksm.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --- mmotm.orig/mm/ksm.c 2013-02-20 22:28:23.584001392 -0800
> +++ mmotm/mm/ksm.c 2013-02-20 22:28:27.288001480 -0800
> @@ -1340,16 +1340,6 @@ struct rmap_item *unstable_tree_search_i
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * If tree_page has been migrated to another NUMA node, it
> - * will be flushed out and put into the right unstable tree
> - * next time: only merge with it if merge_across_nodes.
> - */
> - if (!ksm_merge_across_nodes && page_to_nid(tree_page) != nid) {
> - put_page(tree_page);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> -
> ret = memcmp_pages(page, tree_page);
>
> parent = *new;
> @@ -1359,6 +1349,15 @@ struct rmap_item *unstable_tree_search_i
> } else if (ret > 0) {
> put_page(tree_page);
> new = &parent->rb_right;
> + } else if (!ksm_merge_across_nodes &&
> + page_to_nid(tree_page) != nid) {
> + /*
> + * If tree_page has been migrated to another NUMA node,
> + * it will be flushed out and put in the right unstable
> + * tree next time: only merge with it when across_nodes.
> + */
> + put_page(tree_page);
> + return NULL;
> } else {
> *tree_pagep = tree_page;
> return tree_rmap_item;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 8:17 [PATCH 0/7] ksm: responses to NUMA review Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] ksm: add some comments Hugh Dickins
2013-02-22 4:26 ` Ric Mason
2013-02-22 20:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] ksm: treat unstable nid like in stable tree Hugh Dickins
2013-02-22 7:13 ` Ric Mason [this message]
2013-02-22 21:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-01 5:29 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-01 20:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-02 1:10 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-02 2:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-06 1:28 ` Will Huck
2013-03-06 4:31 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-06 2:37 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06 5:05 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-06 6:58 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06 10:18 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-07 23:26 ` Ric Mason
2013-02-21 8:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] ksm: shrink 32-bit rmap_item back to 32 bytes Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm,ksm: FOLL_MIGRATION do migration_entry_wait Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm,ksm: swapoff might need to copy Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 14:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-22 17:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: cleanup "swapcache" in do_swap_page Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] ksm: allocate roots when needed Hugh Dickins
2013-02-22 3:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] ksm: responses to NUMA review Ric Mason
2013-02-22 20:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-24 1:39 ` Ric Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51271A7D.6020305@gmail.com \
--to=ric.masonn@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).