From: Ric Mason <ric.masonn@gmail.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ksm: treat unstable nid like in stable tree
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:29:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51303CAB.3080406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1302221250440.6100@eggly.anvils>
Hi Hugh,
On 02/23/2013 05:03 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Ric Mason wrote:
>> On 02/21/2013 04:20 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>>> An inconsistency emerged in reviewing the NUMA node changes to KSM:
>>> when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in a stable tree, we say
>>> that it's okay for comparisons, but not as a leaf for merging; whereas
>>> when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in an unstable tree, we
>>> bail out immediately.
>> IIUC
>> - ksm page from the wrong NUMA node will be add to current node's stable tree
Please forgive my late response.
> That should never happen (and when I was checking with a WARN_ON it did
> not happen). What can happen is that a node already in a stable tree
> has its page migrated away to another NUMA node.
>
>> - normal page from the wrong NUMA node will be merged to current node's
>> stable tree <- where I miss here? I didn't see any special handling in
>> function stable_tree_search for this case.
> nid = get_kpfn_nid(page_to_pfn(page));
> root = root_stable_tree + nid;
>
> to choose the right tree for the page, and
>
> if (get_kpfn_nid(stable_node->kpfn) !=
> NUMA(stable_node->nid)) {
> put_page(tree_page);
> goto replace;
> }
>
> to make sure that we don't latch on to a node whose page got migrated away.
I think the ksm implementation for num awareness is buggy.
For page migratyion stuff, new page is allocated from node *which page
is migrated to*.
- when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in an unstable tree
get_kpfn_nid(page_to_pfn(page)) *==* page_to_nid(tree_page)
How can say it's okay for comparisons, but not as a leaf for merging?
- when meeting a page from the wrong NUMA node in an stable tree
- meeting a normal page
- meeting a page which is ksm page before migration
get_kpfn_nid(stable_node->kpfn) != NUMA(stable_node->nid) can't
capture them since stable_node is for tree page in current stable tree.
They are always equal.
>
>> - normal page from the wrong NUMA node will compare but not as a leaf for
>> merging after the patch
> I don't understand you there, but hope my remarks above resolve it.
>
> Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 8:17 [PATCH 0/7] ksm: responses to NUMA review Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] ksm: add some comments Hugh Dickins
2013-02-22 4:26 ` Ric Mason
2013-02-22 20:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] ksm: treat unstable nid like in stable tree Hugh Dickins
2013-02-22 7:13 ` Ric Mason
2013-02-22 21:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-01 5:29 ` Ric Mason [this message]
2013-03-01 20:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-02 1:10 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-02 2:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-06 1:28 ` Will Huck
2013-03-06 4:31 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-06 2:37 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06 5:05 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-03-06 6:58 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-06 10:18 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-07 23:26 ` Ric Mason
2013-02-21 8:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] ksm: shrink 32-bit rmap_item back to 32 bytes Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm,ksm: FOLL_MIGRATION do migration_entry_wait Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm,ksm: swapoff might need to copy Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 14:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2013-02-22 17:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: cleanup "swapcache" in do_swap_page Hugh Dickins
2013-02-21 8:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] ksm: allocate roots when needed Hugh Dickins
2013-02-22 3:44 ` [PATCH 0/7] ksm: responses to NUMA review Ric Mason
2013-02-22 20:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2013-02-24 1:39 ` Ric Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51303CAB.3080406@gmail.com \
--to=ric.masonn@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).