From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx131.postini.com [74.125.245.131]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64CA36B0005 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 23:06:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id wz12so2108693pbc.31 for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:06:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51317AD6.5020406@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:06:46 +0800 From: Simon Jeons MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] add extra free kbytes tunable References: <511EB5CB.2060602@redhat.com> <20130219152936.f079c971.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20130222175634.GA4824@cmpxchg.org> <51307354.5000401@gmail.com> <51307583.2020006@gmail.com> <5131438B.4090507@gmail.com> <51316727.1040806@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Johannes Weiner , dormando , Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel , Seiji Aguchi , Satoru Moriya , Randy Dunlap , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "lwoodman@redhat.com" , Mel Gorman On 03/02/2013 11:08 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Simon Jeons wrote: >> On 03/02/2013 09:42 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013, Simon Jeons wrote: >>>> In function __add_to_swap_cache if add to radix tree successfully will >>>> result >>>> in increase NR_FILE_PAGES, why? This is anonymous page instead of file >>>> backed >>>> page. >>> Right, that's hard to understand without historical background. >>> >>> I think the quick answer would be that we used to (and still do) think >>> of file-cache and swap-cache as two halves of page-cache. And then when >> shmem page should be treated as file-cache or swap-cache? It is strange since >> it is consist of anonymous pages and these pages establish files. > A shmem page is swap-backed file-cache, and it may get transferred to or > from swap-cache: yes, it's a difficult and confusing case, as I said below. > > I would never call it "anonymous", but it is counted in /proc/meminfo's > Active(anon) or Inactive(anon) rather than in (file), because "anon" > there is shorthand for "swap-backed". Oh, I see. Thanks. :) > >>> So you'll find that shmem and swap are counted as file in some places >>> and anon in others, and it's hard to grasp which is where and why, >>> without remembering the history. > Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org