From: Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@gmail.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org >> Linux Memory Management List"
<linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: mm: introduce new field "managed_pages" to struct zone
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 08:21:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51368C01.2090608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51360A87.40008@gmail.com>
On 03/05/2013 11:08 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 03/05/2013 08:19 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
>> On 03/05/2013 12:37 AM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>> On 03/04/2013 07:57 AM, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>>> Hi Jiang,
>>>> On 03/03/2013 11:43 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>> Bootmem allocator is used to managed DMA and Normal memory only, and it does not manage highmem pages because kernel
>>>>> can't directly access highmem pages.
>>>> Why you say so? Could you point out where you figure out bootmem allocator doesn't handle highmem pages? In my understanding, it doesn't distinguish low memory or high memory.
>>> Hi Simon,
>> Hi Jiang,
>>
>> The comments of max_pfn_mapped is "highest direct mapped pfn over 4GB", so if both bootmem allocator and memblock just manage direct mapping pages?
>> BTW, could you show me where you can figure out traditional bootmem allocator manages directly mapping pages?
> Hi Simon,
> Bootmem allocator only manages directly mapped pages, but memblock could manage all pages.
> For traditional bootmem allocator, you could trace back callers of init_bootmem_node() and init_bootmem()
> to get the idea.
Hi Jiang,
I track the callset of init_bootmem() against openrisc
architecture(arch/openrisc/kernel/setup.c), it seems that it manages all
the memory instead of low memory you mentioned. BTW, I didn't read
x86_64 direct mapping codes before, if has enough big memory, what's the
range of direct mapping?
> Regards!
> Gerry
>
>>> According to my understanding, bootmem allocator does only manages lowmem pages.
>>> For traditional bootmem allocator in mm/bootmem.c, it could only manages directly mapped lowmem pages.
>>> For new bootmem allocator in mm/nobootmem.c, it depends on memblock to do the real work. Let's take
>>> x86 as an example:
>>> 1) following code set memblock.current_limit to max_low_pfn.
>>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c: memblock.current_limit = get_max_mapped();
>>> 2) the core of bootmem allocator in nobootmem.c is function __alloc_memory_core_early(),
>>> which has following code to avoid allocate highmem pages:
>>> static void * __init __alloc_memory_core_early(int nid, u64 size, u64 align,
>>> u64 goal, u64 limit)
>>> {
>>> void *ptr;
>>> u64 addr;
>>>
>>> if (limit > memblock.current_limit)
>>> limit = memblock.current_limit;
>>>
>>> addr = memblock_find_in_range_node(goal, limit, size, align, nid);
>>> if (!addr)
>>> return NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> I guess it's the same for other architectures. On the other hand, some other architectures
>>> may allocate highmem pages during boot by directly using memblock interfaces. For example,
>>> ppc use memblock interfaces to allocate highmem pages for giagant hugetlb pages.
>>>
>>> I'm working a patch set to fix those cases.
>>>
>>> Regards!
>>> Gerry
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Regards!
>>>>> Gerry
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/28/2013 02:13 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jiang,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1781291/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You said that the bootmem allocator doesn't touch *highmem pages*, so highmem zones' managed_pages is set to the accurate value "spanned_pages - absent_pages" in function free_area_init_core() and won't be updated anymore. Why it doesn't touch *highmem pages*? Could you point out where you figure out this?
>>>>>>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-28 6:13 mm: introduce new field "managed_pages" to struct zone Simon Jeons
2013-03-03 5:01 ` Ric Mason
2013-03-03 17:13 ` Jiang Liu
2013-03-03 15:43 ` Jiang Liu
2013-03-03 23:57 ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-04 16:37 ` Jiang Liu
2013-03-05 12:19 ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-05 15:08 ` Jiang Liu
2013-03-06 0:21 ` Simon Jeons [this message]
2013-03-08 2:14 ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-08 3:11 ` Jiang Liu
2013-03-05 12:21 ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-05 15:03 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51368C01.2090608@gmail.com \
--to=simon.jeons@gmail.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).