From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
handai.szj@gmail.com, anton.vorontsov@linaro.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] memcg: provide root figures from system totals
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:27:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51368D80.20701@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362489058-3455-3-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
(2013/03/05 22:10), Glauber Costa wrote:
> For the root memcg, there is no need to rely on the res_counters if hierarchy
> is enabled The sum of all mem cgroups plus the tasks in root itself, is
> necessarily the amount of memory used for the whole system. Since those figures
> are already kept somewhere anyway, we can just return them here, without too
> much hassle.
>
> Limit and soft limit can't be set for the root cgroup, so they are left at
> RESOURCE_MAX. Failcnt is left at 0, because its actual meaning is how many
> times we failed allocations due to the limit being hit. We will fail
> allocations in the root cgroup, but the limit will never the reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
I think this patch's calculation is wrong.
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index b8b363f..bfbf1c2 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4996,6 +4996,56 @@ static inline u64 mem_cgroup_usage(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swap)
> return val << PAGE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> +static u64 memcg_read_root_rss(void)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *p;
> +
> + u64 rss = 0;
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + for_each_process(p) {
> + if (!p->mm)
> + continue;
> + task_lock(p);
> + rss += get_mm_rss(p->mm);
> + task_unlock(p);
> + }
> + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> + return rss;
> +}
I think you can use rcu_read_lock() instead of tasklist_lock.
Isn't it enough to use NR_ANON_LRU rather than this ?
> +
> +static u64 mem_cgroup_read_root(enum res_type type, int name)
> +{
> + if (name == RES_LIMIT)
> + return RESOURCE_MAX;
> + if (name == RES_SOFT_LIMIT)
> + return RESOURCE_MAX;
> + if (name == RES_FAILCNT)
> + return 0;
> + if (name == RES_MAX_USAGE)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(name != RES_USAGE))
> + return 0;
> +
> + switch (type) {
> + case _MEM:
> + return (memcg_read_root_rss() +
> + atomic_long_read(&vm_stat[NR_FILE_PAGES])) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + case _MEMSWAP: {
> + struct sysinfo i;
> + si_swapinfo(&i);
> +
> + return ((memcg_read_root_rss() +
> + atomic_long_read(&vm_stat[NR_FILE_PAGES])) << PAGE_SHIFT) +
> + i.totalswap - i.freeswap;
How swapcache is handled ? ...and How kmem works with this calc ?
Thanks,
-Kame
> + }
> + case _KMEM:
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + BUG();
> + };
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> struct file *file, char __user *buf,
> size_t nbytes, loff_t *ppos)
> @@ -5012,6 +5062,19 @@ static ssize_t mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> if (!do_swap_account && type == _MEMSWAP)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> + /*
> + * If we have root-level hierarchy, we can be certain that the charges
> + * in root are always global. We can then bypass the root cgroup
> + * entirely in this case, hopefuly leading to less contention in the
> + * root res_counters. The charges presented after reading it will
> + * always be the global charges.
> + */
> + if (mem_cgroup_disabled() ||
> + (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg) && memcg->use_hierarchy)) {
> + val = mem_cgroup_read_root(type, name);
> + goto root_bypass;
> + }
> +
> switch (type) {
> case _MEM:
> if (name == RES_USAGE)
> @@ -5032,6 +5095,7 @@ static ssize_t mem_cgroup_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft,
> BUG();
> }
>
> +root_bypass:
> len = scnprintf(str, sizeof(str), "%llu\n", (unsigned long long)val);
> return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, nbytes, ppos, str, len);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-05 13:10 [PATCH v2 0/5] bypass root memcg charges if no memcgs are possible Glauber Costa
2013-03-05 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] memcg: make nocpu_base available for non hotplug Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 0:04 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-19 11:07 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-05 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] memcg: provide root figures from system totals Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 0:27 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2013-03-06 8:30 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 10:45 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-06 10:52 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 10:59 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-13 6:58 ` Sha Zhengju
2013-03-13 9:15 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-13 9:59 ` Sha Zhengju
2013-03-14 0:03 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-06 10:50 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-19 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-19 12:55 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-20 7:03 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-20 8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-20 8:08 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-20 8:18 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-20 8:34 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-20 8:58 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-20 9:30 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-21 6:08 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-20 16:40 ` Anton Vorontsov
2013-03-20 7:04 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-05 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] memcg: make it suck faster Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 0:46 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-06 8:38 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 10:54 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-13 8:08 ` Sha Zhengju
2013-03-20 7:13 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-19 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-20 7:00 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-20 8:13 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-05 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] memcg: do not call page_cgroup_init at system_boot Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 1:07 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2013-03-06 8:22 ` Glauber Costa
2013-03-19 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-05 13:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] memcg: do not walk all the way to the root for memcg Glauber Costa
2013-03-06 1:08 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51368D80.20701@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=handai.szj@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).