linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Soeren Moch <smoch@web.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: EHCI: fix for leaking isochronous data
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:48:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51421B89.6020308@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1303101638330.3146-100000@netrider.rowland.org>

On 10.03.2013 21:59, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Soeren Moch wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok. I use 2 em2840-based usb sticks (em28xx driver) attached to a
>>>> Marvell Kirkwood-SoC with a orion-ehci usb controller. These usb sticks
>>>> stream dvb data (digital TV) employing isochronous usb transfers (user
>>>> application is vdr).
>>>>
>>>> Starting from linux-3.6 I see
>>>>      ERROR: 1024 KiB atomic DMA coherent pool is too small!
>>>> in the syslog after several 10 minutes (sometimes hours) of streaming
>>>> and then streaming stops.
>>>>
>>>> In linux-3.6 the memory management for the arm architecture was changed,
>>>> so that atomic coherent dma allocations are served from a special pool.
>>>> This pool gets exhausted. The only user of this pool (in my test) is
>>>> orion-ehci. Although I have only 10 URBs in flight (5 for each stick,
>>>> resubmitted in the completion handler), I have 256 atomic coherent
>>>> allocations (memory from the pool is allocated in pages) from orion-ehci
>>>> when I see this error. So I think there must be a memory leak (memory
>>>> allocated atomic somewhere below the usb_submit_urb call in em28xx-core.c).
>>>>
>>>> With other dvb sticks using usb bulk transfers I never see this error.
>>>>
>>>> Since you already found a memory leak in the ehci driver for isoc
>>>> transfers, I hoped you can help to solve this problem. If there are
>>>> additional questions, please ask. If there is something I can test, I
>>>> would be glad to do so.
>>>
>>> I guess the first thing is to get a dmesg log showing the problem.  You
>>> should build a kernel with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG enabled and post the part
>>> of the dmesg output starting from when you plug in the troublesome DVB
>>> stick.
>>
>> Sorry for my late response. Now I built a kernel 3.8.0 with usb_debug
>> enabled. See below for the syslog of device plug-in.
>>
>>> It also might help to have a record of all the isochronous-related
>>> coherent allocations and deallocations done by the ehci-hcd driver.
>>> Are you comfortable making your own debugging changes?  The allocations
>>> are done by a call to dma_pool_alloc() in
>>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c:itd_urb_transaction() if the device runs
>>> at high speed and sitd_urb_transaction() if the device runs at full
>>> speed.  The deallocations are done by calls to dma_pool_free() in
>>> ehci-timer.c:end_free_itds().
>>>
>>
>> I added a debug message to
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c:itd_urb_transaction() to log the
>> allocation flags, see log below.
>
> But it looks like you didn't add a message to end_free_itds(), so we
> don't know when the memory gets deallocated.  And you didn't print out
> the values of urb, num_itds, and i, or the value of itd (so we can
> match up allocations against deallocations).

OK, I will implement this more detailed logging. But with several 
allocations per second and runtime of several hours this will result in 
a very long logfile.

>> For me this looks like nothing is
>> allocated atomic here, so this function should not be the root cause of
>> the dma coherent pool exhaustion.
>
> I don't understand.  If non-atomic allocations can't exhaust the pool,
> why do we see these allocations fail?

Good point. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the memory management 
details.

Arnd, can memory allocated with dma_pool_alloc() and gfp_flags 
0x20000093 or 0x80000093 come from the atomic dma coherent pool?

>> Are there other allocation functions
>> which I could track?
>
> Yes, but they wouldn't be used for isochronous transfers.  See
> ehci_qtd_alloc(), ehci_qtd_free(), ehci_qh_alloc(), and qh_destroy() in
> ehci-mem.c, as well as some other one-time-only coherent allocations in
> that file.
>
> Alan Stern
>
Soeren Moch

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-14 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1302211337580.1529-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
2013-03-10 18:45 ` [PATCH] USB: EHCI: fix for leaking isochronous data Soeren Moch
2013-03-10 20:59   ` Alan Stern
2013-03-14 18:48     ` Soeren Moch [this message]
2013-03-14 20:22       ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-14 20:32       ` Alan Stern
2013-03-14 20:51         ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-14 21:33           ` Alan Stern
2013-03-15  0:00             ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-15 14:30               ` Alan Stern
2013-03-16  2:10             ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-16 17:39               ` Alan Stern
2013-03-17 16:56                 ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-17 17:36                   ` Alan Stern
2013-03-17 17:39                     ` Alan Stern
2013-03-21 17:04                     ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-21 17:33                       ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-21 19:10                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-21 19:34                           ` Michael Trimarchi
2013-03-21 21:52                           ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-21 21:06                       ` Alan Stern
2013-03-21 21:12                         ` Alan Stern
2013-03-21 21:20                           ` Andrew Lunn
2013-03-21 22:16                             ` Soeren Moch
2013-03-22 14:24                               ` Alan Stern
2013-03-21 21:45                           ` Soeren Moch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51421B89.6020308@web.de \
    --to=smoch@web.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).