From: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] thp: too much anonymous hugepage caused 'khugepaged' thread stopped
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:45:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51612408.5060306@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130407071047.GA8626@hacker.(null)>
On 04/07/2013 03:10 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 02:29:30AM -0400, Zhouping Liu wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> When I did some testing to check thp's performance, the following
>> strange action occurred:
>>
>> when a process try to allocate 500+(or other large value)
>> anonymous hugepage, the 'khugepaged' thread will stop to
>> scan vma. the testing system has 2Gb RAM, and the thp
>> enabled value is 'always', set 0 to 'scan_sleep_millisecs'
>>
>> you can use the following steps to confirm the issue:
>>
>> ---------------- example code ------------
>> /* file test_thp.c */
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include <sys/mman.h>
>>
>> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> {
>> int nr_thps = 1000, ret = 0;
>> unsigned long hugepagesize, size;
>> void *addr;
>>
>> hugepagesize = (1UL << 21);
>>
>> if (argc == 2)
>> nr_thps = atoi(argv[1]);
>>
>> printf("try to allocate %d transparent hugepages\n", nr_thps);
>> size = (unsigned long)nr_thps * hugepagesize;
>>
>> ret = posix_memalign(&addr, hugepagesize, size);
>> if (ret != 0) {
>> printf("posix_memalign failed\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> memset (addr, 10, size);
>>
>> sleep(50);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -------- end example code -----------
>>
>> executing './test_thp 500' in a system with 2GB RAM, the values in
>> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/* will never change,
>> you can repeatedly do '# cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/*' to check this.
>>
>> as we know, when we set 0 to /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/scan_sleep_millisecs,
>> the /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/full_to_scans will increasing at least,
>> but the actual is opposite, the value is never change, so I checked 'khugepaged' thread,
>> and found the 'khugepaged' is stopped:
>> # ps aux | grep -i hugepaged
>> root 67 10.9 0.0 0 0 ? SN Apr06 172:10 [khugepaged]
>> ^^
>> also I did the same actions on some large machine, e.g on 16Gb RAM, 1000+ anonymous hugepages
>> will cause 'khugepaged' stopped, but there are 2Gb+ free memory, why is it? is that normal?
>> comments?
> khugepaged will preallocate one hugepage in NUMA case or alloc one
> hugepage before collapse in UMA case. If the memory is serious
> fragmentation and can't successfully allocate hugepage, khugepaged
> will go to sleep one minute. scan_sleep_millisecs determines how
> many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged between each pass, however,
> alloc_sleep_millisecs(default value is one minute) determines how
> many milliseconds to wait in khugepaged if there's an hugepage
> allocation failure to throttle the next allocation attempt.
I see, I only set scan_sleep_millisecs, didn't care
alloc_sleep_millisecs value.
yes, you are right, allocating memory failure made khugepaged stopped in
my case.
Thanks very much :)
Zhouping
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-07 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1101781431.260745.1365313808038.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
2013-04-07 6:29 ` [BUG?] thp: too much anonymous hugepage caused 'khugepaged' thread stopped Zhouping Liu
2013-04-07 7:10 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-07 7:10 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-07 7:45 ` Zhouping Liu [this message]
2013-04-07 8:33 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-04-07 8:33 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51612408.5060306@redhat.com \
--to=zliu@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).