linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields.
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:28:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5162FE4D.7020308@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOtvUMdT0-oQMTsHAjFqL6K8vrLeCcXG2hX-sShxu6GGRBPxJw@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/08/2013 05:20 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> In free_hot_cold_page(), we rely on pcp->batch remaining stable.
>> Updating it without being on the cpu owning the percpu pageset
>> potentially destroys this stability.
>>
>> Change for_each_cpu() to on_each_cpu() to fix.
>
> Are you referring to this? -

This was the case I noticed.

>
> 1329         if (pcp->count >= pcp->high) {
> 1330                 free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->batch, pcp);
> 1331                 pcp->count -= pcp->batch;
> 1332         }
>
> I'm probably missing the obvious but won't it be simpler to do this in
>   free_hot_cold_page() -
>
> 1329         if (pcp->count >= pcp->high) {
> 1330                  unsigned int batch = ACCESS_ONCE(pcp->batch);
> 1331                 free_pcppages_bulk(zone, batch, pcp);
> 1332                 pcp->count -= batch;
> 1333         }
>

Potentially, yes. Note that this was simply the one case I noticed, 
rather than certainly the only case.

I also wonder whether there could be unexpected interactions between 
->high and ->batch not changing together atomically. For example, could 
adjusting this knob cause ->batch to rise enough that it is greater than 
the previous ->high? If the code above then runs with the previous 
->high, ->count wouldn't be correct (checking this inside 
free_pcppages_bulk() might help on this one issue).

> Now the batch value used is stable and you don't have to IPI every CPU
> in the system just to change a config knob...

Is this really considered an issue? I wouldn't have expected someone to 
adjust the config knob often enough (or even more than once) to cause 
problems. Of course as a "It'd be nice" thing, I completely agree.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-08 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-05 20:33 [PATCH 0/3] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high and ->batch Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/page_alloc: factor out setting of pcp->high and pcp->batch Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07  1:37   ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 17:39     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-09  5:42       ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_alloc: convert zone_pcp_update() to use on_each_cpu() instead of stop_machine() Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:39   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 17:32     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:26       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 19:49         ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 22:18           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-09  1:52             ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07  1:56   ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 17:34     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:41   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 12:20   ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-08 17:28     ` Cody P Schafer [this message]
2013-04-08 19:50       ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 22:23         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-09  6:03       ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09  6:06         ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09 19:27           ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:16     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-07  1:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high and ->batch Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 19:37   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 17:16   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:08     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 21:17       ` Cody P Schafer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5162FE4D.7020308@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).