linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields.
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:27:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51646B8B.7010507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOtvUMc0Wzhr__U5P70Rf5yhp4zvK+vMgsAD3g0ew3a8R46Z6A@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/08/2013 11:06 PM, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> I also wonder whether there could be unexpected interactions between ->high
>>> and ->batch not changing together atomically. For example, could adjusting
>>> this knob cause ->batch to rise enough that it is greater than the previous
>>> ->high? If the code above then runs with the previous ->high, ->count
>>> wouldn't be correct (checking this inside free_pcppages_bulk() might help on
>>> this one issue).
>>
>> You are right, but that can be treated in  setup_pagelist_highmark()  e.g.:
>>
>> 3993 static void setup_pagelist_highmark(struct per_cpu_pageset *p,
>> 3994                                 unsigned long high)
>> 3995 {
>> 3996         struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
>>                  unsigned int batch;
>> 3997
>> 3998         pcp = &p->pcp;
>>                  /* We're about to mess with PCP in an non atomic fashion.
>>                     Put an intermediate safe value of batch and make sure it
>>                     is visible before any other change */
>>                  pcp->batch = 1UL;
>>                  smb_mb();
>>
>> 3999         pcp->high = high;
>
> and i think I missed another needed barrier here:
>                    smp_mb();
>
>>
>> 4000         batch = max(1UL, high/4);
>> 4001         if ((high/4) > (PAGE_SHIFT * 8))
>> 4002                 batch = PAGE_SHIFT * 8;
>>
>>                 pcp->batch = batch;
>> 4003 }
>>
>

Yep, that appears to work, provided no additional users of ->batch and 
->high show up. It seems we'll also need some locking to prevent 
concurrent updaters, but that is relatively light weight.

I'll roll up a new patchset that uses this methodology.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-09 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-05 20:33 [PATCH 0/3] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high and ->batch Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/page_alloc: factor out setting of pcp->high and pcp->batch Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07  1:37   ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 17:39     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-09  5:42       ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/page_alloc: convert zone_pcp_update() to use on_each_cpu() instead of stop_machine() Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:39   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 17:32     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:26       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 19:49         ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 22:18           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-09  1:52             ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-05 20:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: when handling percpu_pagelist_fraction, use on_each_cpu() to set percpu pageset fields Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07  1:56   ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 17:34     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:41   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 12:20   ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-08 17:28     ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:50       ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 22:23         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-09  6:03       ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09  6:06         ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2013-04-09 19:27           ` Cody P Schafer [this message]
2013-04-08 19:16     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-07  1:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high and ->batch Simon Jeons
2013-04-08 19:37   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-07 15:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 17:16   ` Cody P Schafer
2013-04-08 19:08     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-08 21:17       ` Cody P Schafer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51646B8B.7010507@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).