From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx194.postini.com [74.125.245.194]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ED616B009D for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:03:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <517EE01B.80109@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:03:23 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 29 References: <20130429191754.8ee71fb814790bf345516ab8@canb.auug.org.au> <517ED2A6.5030200@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <517ED2A6.5030200@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux MM On 04/29/13 13:05, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/29/13 02:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20130426: >> > > > (who is responsible for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY?) > > > on x86_64: > > warning: (HWPOISON_INJECT && MEM_SOFT_DIRTY) selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR which has unmet direct dependencies (PROC_FS && MMU) > > because MEM_SOFT_DIRTY selects PROC_PAGE_MONITOR when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled. > > > Can MEM_SOFT_DIRTY depend on PROC_FS? > > and the help text for MEM_SOFT_DIRTY refers to Documentation/vm/soft-dirty.txt, > which does not exist. Please add the file. Oops, sorry, I looked in the wrong place for that file, which DOES exist. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org