linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Huck <will.huckk@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Alexey Lyahkov <alexey.lyashkov@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Perepechko <anserper@ya.ru>,
	Robin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Obey mark_page_accessed hint given by filesystems
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 14:28:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5180B601.8080005@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367253119-6461-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

Hi Mel,
On 04/30/2013 12:31 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Andrew Perepechko reported a problem whereby pages are being prematurely
> evicted as the mark_page_accessed() hint is ignored for pages that are
> currently on a pagevec -- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg37340.html .
> Alexey Lyahkov and Robin Dong have also reported problems recently that
> could be due to hot pages reaching the end of the inactive list too quickly
> and be reclaimed.

Both shrink_active_list and shrink_inactive_list can call 
lru_add_drain(), why the hot pages can't be mark Actived during this time?

> Rather than addressing this on a per-filesystem basis, this series aims
> to fix the mark_page_accessed() interface by deferring what LRU a page
> is added to pagevec drain time and allowing mark_page_accessed() to call
> SetPageActive on a pagevec page. This opens some important races that
> I think should be harmless but needs double checking. The races and the
> VM_BUG_ON checks that are removed are all described in patch 2.
>
> This series received only very light testing but it did not immediately
> blow up and a debugging patch confirmed that pages are now getting added
> to the active file LRU list that would previously have been added to the
> inactive list.
>
>   fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c    | 30 ++++++------------------
>   fs/nfs/dir.c            |  7 ++----
>   include/linux/pagevec.h | 34 +--------------------------
>   mm/swap.c               | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>   mm/vmscan.c             |  3 ---
>   5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-01  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-29 16:31 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Obey mark_page_accessed hint given by filesystems Mel Gorman
2013-04-29 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: pagevec: Defer deciding what LRU to add a page to until pagevec drain time Mel Gorman
2013-04-29 16:50   ` Rik van Riel
2013-05-03  7:51   ` Jan Kara
2013-05-03  8:37     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-29 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: Ensure that mark_page_accessed moves pages to the active list Mel Gorman
2013-04-29 17:12   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-29 21:53     ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-01  5:41   ` Sam Ben
2013-05-01  8:06     ` Mel Gorman
2013-05-01  8:14       ` Ric Mason
2013-05-01  8:31         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-29 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: Remove lru parameter from __pagevec_lru_add and remove parts of pagevec API Mel Gorman
2013-05-03  8:00   ` Jan Kara
2013-05-01  6:28 ` Will Huck [this message]
2013-05-01  8:08   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Obey mark_page_accessed hint given by filesystems Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5180B601.8080005@gmail.com \
    --to=will.huckk@gmail.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexey.lyashkov@gmail.com \
    --cc=anserper@ya.ru \
    --cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sanbai@taobao.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).