linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, qiuxishi <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
Subject: Transparent Hugepage impact on memcpy
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:57:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ADAC15.1050103@huawei.com> (raw)

Hi all,

I tested memcpy with perf bench, and found that in prefault case, When Transparent Hugepage is on,
memcpy has worse performance.

When THP on is 3.672879 GB/Sec (with prefault), while THP off is 6.190187 GB/Sec (with prefault).

I think THP will improve performance, but the test result obviously not the case. 
Andrea mentioned THP cause "clear_page/copy_page less cache friendly" in
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/slides/2011/lfcs/lfcs2011_hpc_arcangeli.pdf.

I am not quite understand this, could you please give me some comments, Thanks!

I test in Linux-3.4-stable, and my machine info is:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5520  @ 2.27GHz

available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 8 9 10 11
node 0 size: 24567 MB
node 0 free: 23550 MB
node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7 12 13 14 15
node 1 size: 24576 MB
node 1 free: 23767 MB
node distances:
node   0   1 
  0:  10  20 
  1:  20  10

Below is test result:
---with THP---
#cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
[always] madvise never
#./perf bench mem memcpy -l 1gb -o
# Running mem/memcpy benchmark...
# Copying 1gb Bytes ...

       3.672879 GB/Sec (with prefault)

#./perf stat ...
Performance counter stats for './perf bench mem memcpy -l 1gb -o':

          35455940 cache-misses              #   53.504 % of all cache refs     [49.45%]
          66267785 cache-references                                             [49.78%]
              2409 page-faults                                                 
         450768651 dTLB-loads
                                                  [50.78%]
             24580 dTLB-misses
              #    0.01% of all dTLB cache hits  [51.01%]
        1338974202 dTLB-stores
                                                 [50.63%]
             77943 dTLB-misses
                                                 [50.24%]
         697404997 iTLB-loads
                                                  [49.77%]
               274 iTLB-misses
              #    0.00% of all iTLB cache hits  [49.30%]

       0.855041819 seconds time elapsed

---no THP---
#cat /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
always madvise [never]

#./perf bench mem memcpy -l 1gb -o
# Running mem/memcpy benchmark...
# Copying 1gb Bytes ...

       6.190187 GB/Sec (with prefault)

#./perf stat ...
Performance counter stats for './perf bench mem memcpy -l 1gb -o':

          16920763 cache-misses              #   98.377 % of all cache refs     [50.01%]
          17200000 cache-references                                             [50.04%]
            524652 page-faults                                                 
         734365659 dTLB-loads
                                                  [50.04%]
           4986387 dTLB-misses
              #    0.68% of all dTLB cache hits  [50.04%]
        1013408298 dTLB-stores
                                                 [50.04%]
           8180817 dTLB-misses
                                                 [49.97%]
        1526642351 iTLB-loads
                                                  [50.41%]
                56 iTLB-misses
              #    0.00% of all iTLB cache hits  [50.21%]

       1.025425847 seconds time elapsed

Thanks,
Jianguo Wu.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2013-06-04  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-04  8:57 Jianguo Wu [this message]
2013-06-04 12:30 ` Transparent Hugepage impact on memcpy Wanpeng Li
2013-06-04 12:30 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-06-04 20:20   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2013-06-05  2:49     ` Jianguo Wu
     [not found] ` <51adde12.e6b2320a.610d.ffff96f3SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-06-04 12:55   ` Jianguo Wu
2013-06-04 14:10 ` Hush Bensen
2013-06-05  3:26 ` Jianguo Wu
2013-06-06 13:54   ` Hitoshi Mitake
2013-06-07  1:26     ` Jianguo Wu
2013-06-07 13:50       ` Hitoshi Mitake
2013-06-08  1:13         ` Jianguo Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51ADAC15.1050103@huawei.com \
    --to=wujianguo@huawei.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).