From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx103.postini.com [74.125.245.103]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24EF06B0032 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:19:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <51BF9960.904@intel.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:18:56 +0800 From: Alex Shi MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Performance regression from switching lock to rw-sem for anon-vma tree References: <1371165333.27102.568.camel@schen9-DESK> <1371167015.1754.14.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <51BD8A77.2080201@intel.com> <1371486122.1778.14.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <1371494746.27102.633.camel@schen9-DESK> In-Reply-To: <1371494746.27102.633.camel@schen9-DESK> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tim Chen Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Michel Lespinasse , "Wilcox, Matthew R" , Dave Hansen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" On 06/18/2013 02:45 AM, Tim Chen wrote: >>> + if (unlikely(sem->count < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) { >>> > > + cpu_relax(); >>> > > + continue; >>> > > + } > The above two if statements could be cleaned up as a single check: > > if (unlikely(sem->count < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) > return sem; > > This one statement is sufficient to check that we don't have a writer > stolen the lock before we attempt to acquire the read lock by modifying > sem->count. > > Thanks. I will send out the patchset base your suggestion. -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org