linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] sched: Split accounting of NUMA hinting faults that pass two-stage filter
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:24:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D585A8.3070001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130704092356.GK1875@suse.de>

On 07/04/2013 05:23 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:

> I think that dealing with this specific problem is a series all on its
> own and treating it on its own in isolation would be best.

Agreed, lets tackle one thing at a time, otherwise we will
(once again) end up with a patch series that is too large
to merge.

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-04 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-03 14:21 [PATCH 0/13] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V2 Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/13] mm: numa: Document automatic NUMA balancing sysctls Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/13] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/13] sched: Select a preferred node with the most numa hinting faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 04/13] sched: Update NUMA hinting faults once per scan Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 05/13] sched: Favour moving tasks towards the preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 06/13] sched: Reschedule task on preferred NUMA node once selected Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 12:26   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 13:29     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 07/13] sched: Split accounting of NUMA hinting faults that pass two-stage filter Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 21:56   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-04  9:23     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 14:24       ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2013-07-04 19:36       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-05  9:41         ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-05 10:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 08/13] sched: Increase NUMA PTE scanning when a new preferred node is selected Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 09/13] sched: Favour moving tasks towards nodes that incurred more faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:25     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 10/13] sched: Set the scan rate proportional to the size of the task being scanned Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 11/13] sched: Check current->mm before allocating NUMA faults Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 15:33   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 12:48   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-05 10:07     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 12/13] mm: numa: Scan pages with elevated page_mapcount Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:32     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-03 14:21 ` [PATCH 13/13] sched: Account for the number of preferred tasks running on a node when selecting a preferred node Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 18:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04  9:37     ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 13:07       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-04 13:54         ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 14:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 14:40             ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 16:19 ` [PATCH 0/13] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V2 Mel Gorman
2013-07-03 16:26   ` Mel Gorman
2013-07-04 18:02 ` [PATCH RFC WIP] Process weights based scheduling for better consolidation Srikar Dronamraju
2013-07-05 10:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05 12:49     ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D585A8.3070001@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).