linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ben <sam.bennn@gmail.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Nate Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:17:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E628F8.6030303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373594635-131067-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com>

On 07/12/2013 10:03 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> We have been working on this since we returned from shutdown and have
> something to discuss now.  We restricted ourselves to 2MiB initialization
> to keep the patch set a little smaller and more clear.
>
> First, I think I want to propose getting rid of the page flag.  If I knew
> of a concrete way to determine that the page has not been initialized,
> this patch series would look different.  If there is no definitive
> way to determine that the struct page has been initialized aside from
> checking the entire page struct is zero, then I think I would suggest
> we change the page flag to indicate the page has been initialized.
>
> The heart of the problem as I see it comes from expand().  We nearly
> always see a first reference to a struct page which is in the middle
> of the 2MiB region.  Due to that access, the unlikely() check that was
> originally proposed really ends up referencing a different page entirely.
> We actually did not introduce an unlikely and refactor the patches to
> make that unlikely inside a static inline function.  Also, given the
> strong warning at the head of expand(), we did not feel experienced
> enough to refactor it to make things always reference the 2MiB page
> first.
>
> With this patch, we did boot a 16TiB machine.  Without the patches,
> the v3.10 kernel with the same configuration took 407 seconds for
> free_all_bootmem.  With the patches and operating on 2MiB pages instead
> of 1GiB, it took 26 seconds so performance was improved.  I have no feel
> for how the 1GiB chunk size will perform.

How to test how much time spend on free_all_bootmem?

>
> I am on vacation for the next three days so I am sorry in advance for
> my infrequent or non-existant responses.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nate Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-12  2:03 [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 1/4] memblock: Introduce a for_each_reserved_mem_region iterator Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 2/4] Have __free_pages_memory() free in larger chunks Robin Holt
2013-07-12  7:45   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-13  3:08     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-16 13:02   ` Sam Ben
2013-07-23 15:32     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 3/4] Seperate page initialization into a separate function Robin Holt
2013-07-13  3:06   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-15  3:19     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  2:03 ` [RFC 4/4] Sparse initialization of struct page array Robin Holt
2013-07-13  4:19   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  4:39     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-13  5:31       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-13  5:38         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-15 14:08         ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-07-15 17:45     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-07-15 17:54       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-15 18:26         ` Robin Holt
2013-07-15 18:29           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-23  8:32             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-23 11:09               ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:15                 ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:41                   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-23 11:50                     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-16 10:26     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25  2:25     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25 12:50       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-25 13:42         ` Robin Holt
2013-07-25 13:52           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-15 21:30   ` Andrew Morton
2013-07-16 10:38     ` Robin Holt
2013-07-12  8:27 ` [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-07-12  8:47   ` boot tracing Borislav Petkov
2013-07-12  8:53     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-15  1:38       ` Sam Ben
2013-07-23  8:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-12  9:19   ` [RFC 0/4] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Robert Richter
2013-07-15 15:16   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-16  8:55   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16  9:08     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-23  8:20       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-07-15 15:00 ` Robin Holt
2013-07-17  5:17 ` Sam Ben [this message]
2013-07-17  9:30   ` Robin Holt
2013-07-19 23:51     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-07-22  6:13       ` Robin Holt
2013-08-02 17:44 ` [RFC v2 0/5] " Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 1/5] memblock: Introduce a for_each_reserved_mem_region iterator Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 2/5] Have __free_pages_memory() free in larger chunks Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 3/5] Move page initialization into a separate function Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 4/5] Only set page reserved in the memblock region Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-03 20:04     ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-02 17:44   ` [RFC v2 5/5] Sparse initialization of struct page array Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-05  9:58   ` [RFC v2 0/5] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-08-12 21:54   ` [RFC v3 " Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 1/5] memblock: Introduce a for_each_reserved_mem_region iterator Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 2/5] Have __free_pages_memory() free in larger chunks Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 3/5] Move page initialization into a separate function Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 4/5] Only set page reserved in the memblock region Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-12 21:54     ` [RFC v3 5/5] Sparse initialization of struct page array Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 10:58     ` [RFC v3 0/5] Transparent on-demand struct page initialization embedded in the buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-08-13 17:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-13 17:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-13 17:33       ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 17:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-13 18:04           ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 19:06             ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 20:24               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-13 20:37                 ` Mike Travis
2013-08-13 21:35             ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 23:10           ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-13 23:55             ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-14 11:27               ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-14 11:05           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-08-14 22:15             ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-08-16 16:36     ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E628F8.6030303@gmail.com \
    --to=sam.bennn@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).