linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>,
	"Michel Lespinasse" <walken@google.com>,
	"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
	"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>, "Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: munlock: manual pte walk in fast path instead of follow_page_mask()
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:18:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5215F392.8070305@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130819154754.4a504e2f7f4be455c164615b@linux-foundation.org>

On 08/20/2013 12:47 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:23:42 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
>> Currently munlock_vma_pages_range() calls follow_page_mask() to obtain each
>> struct page. This entails repeated full page table translations and page table
>> lock taken for each page separately.
>>
>> This patch attempts to avoid the costly follow_page_mask() where possible, by
>> iterating over ptes within single pmd under single page table lock. The first
>> pte is obtained by get_locked_pte() for non-THP page acquired by the initial
>> follow_page_mask(). The latter function is also used as a fallback in case
>> simple pte_present() and vm_normal_page() are not sufficient to obtain the
>> struct page.
> 
> Patch #7 appears to provide significant performance gains, but the
> improvement wasn't individually described here, unlike the other
> patches.

Oops I forgot to mention this here. Can you please add the following to
the comment then? Thanks.

After this patch, a 13% speedup was measured for munlocking a 56GB large
memory area with THP disabled.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-19 12:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] Improving munlock() performance for large non-THP areas Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: putback_lru_page: remove unnecessary call to page_lru_base_type() Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 14:48   ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-19 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: munlock: remove unnecessary call to lru_add_drain() Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 14:48   ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-19 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: munlock: batch non-THP page isolation and munlock+putback using pagevec Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 14:58   ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-19 22:38   ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-22 11:13     ` Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm: munlock: batch NR_MLOCK zone state updates Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 15:01   ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-19 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: munlock: bypass per-cpu pvec for putback_lru_page Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 15:05   ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-19 22:45   ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-22 11:16     ` Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: munlock: remove redundant get_page/put_page pair on the fast path Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 15:07   ` Mel Gorman
2013-08-19 12:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: munlock: manual pte walk in fast path instead of follow_page_mask() Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 22:47   ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-22 11:18     ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2013-08-27 22:24   ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-29 13:02     ` Vlastimil Babka
2013-08-19 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Improving munlock() performance for large non-THP areas Andrew Morton
2013-08-22 11:21   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5215F392.8070305@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).