From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9466B0031 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 11:44:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y10so4748918pdj.36 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id uo5so4730130pbc.37 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 08:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5241B32E.3090803@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:43:42 +0800 From: Zhang Yanfei MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mem-hotplug: Introduce movablenode boot option References: <524162DA.30004@cn.fujitsu.com> <5241655E.1000007@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130924124121.GG2366@htj.dyndns.org> <5241944B.4050103@gmail.com> <5241AEC0.6040505@gmail.com> <20130924153259.GM2366@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20130924153259.GM2366@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Tejun Heo Cc: Zhang Yanfei , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , lenb@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , mingo@elte.hu, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Toshi Kani , Wanpeng Li , Thomas Renninger , Yinghai Lu , Jiang Liu , Wen Congyang , Lai Jiangshan , isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, Rik van Riel , jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, "x86@kernel.org" , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux MM , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, imtangchen@gmail.com On 09/24/2013 11:32 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:24:48PM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote: >> I am now preparing the v5 version. Only in this patch we haven't come to an >> agreement. So as for the boot option name, after my explanation, do you still >> have the objection? Or you could suggest a good name for us, that'll be >> very thankful:) > > No particular idea and my concern about the name isn't very strong. > It just doesn't seem like a good name to me. It's a bit obscure and > we may want to do more things for hotplug later which may not fit the > param name. If you guys think it's good enough, please go ahead. > Thanks very much! I have addressed your comments and finish the v5 version. Please help checking them again after I send them to the community. Thanks. -- Thanks. Zhang Yanfei -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org