From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com (mail-pb0-f43.google.com [209.85.160.43]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5AF6B0036 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 13:25:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md4so7395413pbc.2 for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5252EE60.7030806@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 13:24:48 -0400 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/63] sched: numa: Continue PTE scanning even if migrate rate limited References: <1381141781-10992-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1381141781-10992-15-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1381141781-10992-15-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Ingo Molnar , Andrea Arcangeli , Johannes Weiner , Linux-MM , LKML On 10/07/2013 06:28 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra > > Avoiding marking PTEs pte_numa because a particular NUMA node is migrate rate > limited sees like a bad idea. Even if this node can't migrate anymore other > nodes might and we want up-to-date information to do balance decisions. > We already rate limit the actual migrations, this should leave enough > bandwidth to allow the non-migrating scanning. I think its important we > keep up-to-date information if we're going to do placement based on it. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org