From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
lenb@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
mingo@elte.hu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
mina86@mina86.com, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com,
lwoodman@redhat.com, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, imtangchen@gmail.com,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH part1 v7 1/6] memblock: Factor out of top-down allocation
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:16:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52570B04.2030608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52570A6E.2010806@gmail.com>
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
This patch creates a new function __memblock_find_range_top_down
to factor out of top-down allocation from memblock_find_in_range_node.
This is a preparation because we will introduce a new bottom-up
allocation mode in the following patch.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memblock.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 0ac412a..accff10 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -83,33 +83,25 @@ static long __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
}
/**
- * memblock_find_in_range_node - find free area in given range and node
+ * __memblock_find_range_top_down - find free area utility, in top-down
* @start: start of candidate range
* @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
* @size: size of free area to find
* @align: alignment of free area to find
* @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
*
- * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node.
+ * Utility called from memblock_find_in_range_node(), find free area top-down.
*
* RETURNS:
* Found address on success, %0 on failure.
*/
-phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
- phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
- phys_addr_t align, int nid)
+static phys_addr_t __init_memblock
+__memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
+ phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int nid)
{
phys_addr_t this_start, this_end, cand;
u64 i;
- /* pump up @end */
- if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
- end = memblock.current_limit;
-
- /* avoid allocating the first page */
- start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE);
- end = max(start, end);
-
for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(i, nid, &this_start, &this_end, NULL) {
this_start = clamp(this_start, start, end);
this_end = clamp(this_end, start, end);
@@ -121,10 +113,39 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
if (cand >= this_start)
return cand;
}
+
return 0;
}
/**
+ * memblock_find_in_range_node - find free area in given range and node
+ * @start: start of candidate range
+ * @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
+ * @size: size of free area to find
+ * @align: alignment of free area to find
+ * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
+ *
+ * Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node.
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * Found address on success, %0 on failure.
+ */
+phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range_node(phys_addr_t start,
+ phys_addr_t end, phys_addr_t size,
+ phys_addr_t align, int nid)
+{
+ /* pump up @end */
+ if (end == MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE)
+ end = memblock.current_limit;
+
+ /* avoid allocating the first page */
+ start = max_t(phys_addr_t, start, PAGE_SIZE);
+ end = max(start, end);
+
+ return __memblock_find_range_top_down(start, end, size, align, nid);
+}
+
+/**
* memblock_find_in_range - find free area in given range
* @start: start of candidate range
* @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-10 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-10 20:13 [PATCH part1 v7 0/6] x86, memblock: Allocate memory near kernel image before SRAT parsed Zhang Yanfei
2013-10-10 20:16 ` Zhang Yanfei [this message]
2013-10-10 20:17 ` [PATCH part1 v7 2/6] memblock: Introduce bottom-up allocation mode Zhang Yanfei
2013-10-10 20:18 ` [PATCH part1 v7 3/6] x86/mm: Factor out of top-down direct mapping setup Zhang Yanfei
2013-10-10 20:19 ` [PATCH part1 v7 4/6] x86/mem-hotplug: Support initialize page tables in bottom-up Zhang Yanfei
2013-10-10 20:20 ` [PATCH part1 v7 5/6] x86, acpi, crash, kdump: Do reserve_crashkernel() after SRAT is parsed Zhang Yanfei
2013-10-10 20:21 ` [PATCH part1 v7 6/6] mem-hotplug: Introduce movable_node boot option Zhang Yanfei
2013-10-11 0:00 ` [PATCH part1 v7 0/6] x86, memblock: Allocate memory near kernel image before SRAT parsed Zhang Yanfei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52570B04.2030608@gmail.com \
--to=zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imtangchen@gmail.com \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).