From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Add tunable to control THP behavior
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:37:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AA2C87.5040509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131212180050.GC134240@sgi.com>
On 12/12/2013 01:00 PM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> This part of the patch adds a tunable to
> /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage called threshold. This threshold
> determines how many pages a user must fault in from a single node before
> a temporary compound page is turned into a THP.
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ unsigned long transparent_hugepage_flags __read_mostly =
> (1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEFRAG_KHUGEPAGED_FLAG)|
> (1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_USE_ZERO_PAGE_FLAG);
>
> +/* default to 1 page threshold for handing out thps; maintains old behavior */
> +static int transparent_hugepage_threshold = 1;
I assume the motivation for writing all this code is that "1"
was not a good value in your tests.
That makes me wonder, why should 1 be the default value with
your patches?
If there is a better value, why should we not use that?
What is the upside of using a better value?
What is the downside?
Is there a value that would to bound the downside, so it
is almost always smaller than the upside?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1386790423.git.athorlton@sgi.com>
2013-12-12 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Add flags for temporary compound pages Alex Thorlton
2013-12-12 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] Add tunable to control THP behavior Alex Thorlton
2013-12-12 20:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-12-12 20:49 ` Alex Thorlton
2013-12-12 20:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-12-12 21:04 ` Alex Thorlton
2013-12-12 21:37 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2013-12-12 23:17 ` Alex Thorlton
2013-12-12 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] Change " Alex Thorlton
2013-12-13 13:13 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-12-16 17:37 ` Alex Thorlton
2013-12-13 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AA2C87.5040509@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).