From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@iki.fi>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@parallels.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg()
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:23:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B2C92D.2020301@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B2BBB4.3090209@parallels.com>
On 12/19/2013 11:26 AM, Vasily Averin wrote:
> On 12/19/2013 12:39 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> On 12/19/2013 12:17 PM, Vasily Averin wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2013 05:16 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>>>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>>>> @@ -176,8 +176,9 @@ kmem_cache_create_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const char *name, size_t size,
>>>> get_online_cpus();
>>>> mutex_lock(&slab_mutex);
>>>>
>>>> - if (!kmem_cache_sanity_check(memcg, name, size) == 0)
>>>> - goto out_locked;
>>>> + err = kmem_cache_sanity_check(memcg, name, size);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Some allocators will constraint the set of valid flags to a subset
>>> Theoretically in future kmem_cache_sanity_check() can return positive value.
>>> Probably it's better to check (err < 0) in caller ?
>> Hmm, why? What information could positive retval carry here? We have
>> plenty of places throughout the code where we check for (err), not
>> (err<0), simply because it looks clearer, e.g. look at
>> __kmem_cache_create() calls. If it returns a positive value one day, we
>> will have to parse every place where it's called. Anyway, if someone
>> wants to change a function behavior, he must check every place where
>> this function is called and fix them accordingly.
> I believe expected semantic of function -- return negative in case of error.
> So correct error cheek should be (err < 0).
> (err) check is semantically incorrect, and it can lead to troubles in future.
I don't know what semantics you are referring to but a typical
convention in mm/*.c is to return zero on success and negative on error
but never positive numbers.
Looking at mm/slab_common.c, "if (err)" is the established convention so
using "if (err < 0)" just because is pointless here.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 13:16 [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] memcg, slab: kmem_cache_create_memcg(): free memcg params on error Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:32 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:01 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] memcg, slab: cleanup barrier usage when accessing memcg_caches Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:14 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:37 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:10 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:16 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:29 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:53 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] memcg, slab: check and init memcg_cahes under slab_mutex Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 17:41 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 7:07 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:00 ` Glauber Costa
2013-12-19 9:12 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:17 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:21 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] memcg: clear memcg_params after removing cache from memcg_slab_caches list Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-18 13:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] memcg, slab: RCU protect memcg_params for root caches Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:36 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:43 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 9:47 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 10:06 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-18 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] slab: cleanup kmem_cache_create_memcg() Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 6:31 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 8:51 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:16 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 7:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-12-19 8:17 ` [Devel] " Vasily Averin
2013-12-19 8:39 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:26 ` Vasily Averin
2013-12-19 9:42 ` Vladimir Davydov
2013-12-19 9:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-12-19 10:23 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B2C92D.2020301@iki.fi \
--to=penberg@iki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
--cc=vvs@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).