From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: fix accumulate per cpu partial cache objects
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:50:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52BE2E74.1070107@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388137619-14741-1-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 2013/12/27 17:46, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> SLUB per cpu partial cache is a list of slab caches to accelerate objects
> allocation. However, current codes just accumulate the objects number of
> the first slab cache of per cpu partial cache instead of traverse the whole
> list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 545a170..799bfdc 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -4280,7 +4280,7 @@ static ssize_t show_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s,
> struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab,
> cpu);
> int node;
> - struct page *page;
> + struct page *page, *p;
>
> page = ACCESS_ONCE(c->page);
> if (!page)
> @@ -4298,8 +4298,9 @@ static ssize_t show_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s,
> nodes[node] += x;
>
> page = ACCESS_ONCE(c->partial);
> - if (page) {
> - x = page->pobjects;
> + while ((p = page)) {
> + page = p->next;
> + x = p->pobjects;
> total += x;
> nodes[node] += x;
> }
Can we apply this patch first? It was sent month ago, but Pekka was not responsive.
=============================
[PATCH] slub: Fix calculation of cpu slabs
/sys/kernel/slab/:t-0000048 # cat cpu_slabs
231 N0=16 N1=215
/sys/kernel/slab/:t-0000048 # cat slabs
145 N0=36 N1=109
See, the number of slabs is smaller than that of cpu slabs.
The bug was introduced by commit 49e2258586b423684f03c278149ab46d8f8b6700
("slub: per cpu cache for partial pages").
We should use page->pages instead of page->pobjects when calculating
the number of cpu partial slabs. This also fixes the mapping of slabs
and nodes.
As there's no variable storing the number of total/active objects in
cpu partial slabs, and we don't have user interfaces requiring those
statistics, I just add WARN_ON for those cases.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index e3ba1f2..6ea461d 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -4300,7 +4300,13 @@ static ssize_t show_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s,
page = ACCESS_ONCE(c->partial);
if (page) {
- x = page->pobjects;
+ node = page_to_nid(page);
+ if (flags & SO_TOTAL)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ else if (flags & SO_OBJECTS)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ else
+ x = page->pages;
total += x;
nodes[node] += x;
}
-- 1.8.0.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-28 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-27 9:46 [PATCH] mm/slub: fix accumulate per cpu partial cache objects Wanpeng Li
2013-12-28 1:50 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-12-29 11:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2013-12-30 1:08 ` Wanpeng Li
[not found] ` <20131230010800.GA1623@hacker.(null)>
2013-12-30 9:54 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52BE2E74.1070107@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).