From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: nobootmem: avoid type warning about alignment value
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:46:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D2B8ED.2010006@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D2B7C8.4060103@ti.com>
On Sunday 12 January 2014 10:42 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Sunday 12 January 2014 05:59 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:02:30PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> On Monday 09 December 2013 07:54 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> The underlying reason is that - as I've already explained - ARM's __ffs()
>>>> differs from other architectures in that it ends up being an int, whereas
>>>> almost everyone else is unsigned long.
>>>>
>>>> The fix is to fix ARMs __ffs() to conform to other architectures.
>>>>
>>> I was just about to cross-post your reply here. Obviously I didn't think
>>> this far when I made $subject fix.
>>>
>>> So lets ignore the $subject patch which is not correct. Sorry for noise
>>
>> Well, here we are, a month on, and this still remains unfixed despite
>> my comments pointing to what the problem is. So, here's a patch to fix
>> this problem the correct way. I took the time to add some comments to
>> these functions as I find that I wonder about their return values, and
>> these comments make the patch a little larger than it otherwise would be.
>>
> The $subject warning fix [1] is already picked by Andrew with your ack
> and its in his queue [2]
>
>> This patch makes their types match exactly with x86's definitions of
>> the same, which is the basic problem: on ARM, they all took "int" values
>> and returned "int"s, which leads to min() in nobootmem.c complaining.
>>
> Not sure if you missed the thread but the right fix was picked. Ofcourse
> you do have additional clz optimisation in updated patch and some comments
> on those functions.
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/9/811
fixing the link since above was the link to the $subject thread and below is
the correct link for updated patch
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/20/497
> [2] http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-arm-fix-arms-__ffs-to-conform-to-avoid-warning-with-no_bootmem.patch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-12 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-23 23:28 [PATCH] mm: nobootmem: avoid type warning about alignment value Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-24 15:14 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-11-25 13:57 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-11-25 15:56 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-10 0:39 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-10 0:50 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-10 0:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-10 1:02 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-12 10:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-12 15:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-12 15:46 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2014-01-13 12:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-13 14:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-13 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-13 23:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-01-13 23:41 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-15 3:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D2B8ED.2010006@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).