From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
rientjes@google.com, seanjc@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
vannapurve@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com, jiaqiyan@google.com,
tabba@google.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/7] mm: selftests: Add shmem memory failure test
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 20:36:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52c26e05-5bbc-4f63-84bf-c4879a6de7d1@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acHeLL0l948jRchK@google.com>
On 3/24/26 8:43 AM, Lisa Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 02:30:04PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/20/26 7:30 AM, Lisa Wang wrote:
>>> Add a shmem memory failure selftest to test the shmem memory failure is
>>> correct after modifying shmem return value.
>>>
>>> Test that
>>> + madvise() call returns 0 at the first time
>>> + trigger a SIGBUS when the poisoned shmem page is fault-in again.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Why not move the shmem memory failure test into memory-failure.c?
>
> Do you mean let memory-failure.c kernel code check by itself?
> The reason I write the selftest instead of combining in memory-failure.c
> is because
> + do not need extra checking code in kernel code
> + make it easier to trace the entire execution flow, starting from the
> madvise() down through shmem_error_remove_folio() and into the
> truncate_error_folio() logic.
>
> Pleas let me know if I've missed something. Thanks!
That's not quite what I meant. I mean, since there is already a
memory-failure.c in mm selftests (see [1]), I think we should move the
shmem memory failure test cases into that file.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260206031639.2707102-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com/T/#m18e62ccb3e87316ec37dcde9389c1ba1c56d0951
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 23:30 [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] mm: Fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/7] mm: memory_failure: Clarify the MF_DELAYED definition Lisa Wang
2026-03-22 21:34 ` Jiaqi Yan
2026-03-23 21:18 ` Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/7] mm: memory_failure: Allow truncate_error_folio to return MF_DELAYED Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/7] mm: shmem: Update shmem handler to the MF_DELAYED definition Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/7] mm: memory_failure: Generalize extra_pins handling to all MF_DELAYED cases Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/7] mm: selftests: Add shmem memory failure test Lisa Wang
2026-03-21 6:30 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-24 0:43 ` Lisa Wang
2026-03-24 12:36 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/7] KVM: selftests: Add memory failure tests in guest_memfd_test Lisa Wang
2026-03-19 23:30 ` [PATCH RFC v2 7/7] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd behavior with respect to stage 2 page tables Lisa Wang
2026-03-20 2:39 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/7] mm: Fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52c26e05-5bbc-4f63-84bf-c4879a6de7d1@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=wyihan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox