From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Only force scan in reclaim when none of the LRUs are big enough.
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:41:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53348D09.3060802@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1403151957160.21388@eggly.anvils>
On 03/15/2014 11:36 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> From: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
>
> Prior to this change, we would decide whether to force scan a LRU
> during reclaim if that LRU itself was too small for the current
> priority. However, this can lead to the file LRU getting force
> scanned even if there are a lot of anonymous pages we can reclaim,
> leading to hot file pages getting needlessly reclaimed.
>
> To address this, we instead only force scan when none of the
> reclaimable LRUs are big enough.
>
> Gives huge improvements with zswap. For example, when doing -j20
> kernel build in a 500MB container with zswap enabled, runtime (in
> seconds) is greatly reduced:
>
> x without this change
> + with this change
> N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
> x 5 700.997 790.076 763.928 754.05 39.59493
> + 5 141.634 197.899 155.706 161.9 21.270224
> Difference at 95.0% confidence
> -592.15 +/- 46.3521
> -78.5293% +/- 6.14709%
> (Student's t, pooled s = 31.7819)
>
> Should also give some improvements in regular (non-zswap) swap cases.
>
> Yes, hughd found significant speedup using regular swap, with several
> memcgs under pressure; and it should also be effective in the non-memcg
> case, whenever one or another zone LRU is forced too small.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-16 3:36 [PATCH] mm: Only force scan in reclaim when none of the LRUs are big enough Hugh Dickins
2014-03-27 20:41 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-03-28 18:10 ` Rafael Aquini
2014-04-01 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53348D09.3060802@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=semenzato@google.com \
--cc=sjennings@variantweb.net \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).