Re: [PATCH] mm,writeback: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

On 04/29/2014 06:39 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:19:10 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, leading to a
>> divide by zero error. Blindly adding 1 to "limit - setpoint" is not
>> working, so we need to actually test the divisor before calling div64.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
>> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> @@ -597,11 +597,16 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
>>  					  unsigned long dirty,
>>  					  unsigned long limit)
>>  {
>> +	unsigned int divisor;
> 
> I'm thinking this would be better as a ulong so I don't have to worry
> my pretty head over truncation things?

I looked at div_*64, and the second argument is a 32 bit
variable. I guess a long would be ok, since if we are
dividing by more than 4 billion we don't really care :)

static inline s64 div_s64(s64 dividend, s32 divisor)

> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c~mm-page-writebackc-fix-divide-by-zero-in-pos_ratio_polynom-fix
> +++ a/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -597,13 +597,13 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polyno
>  					  unsigned long dirty,
>  					  unsigned long limit)
>  {
> -	unsigned int divisor;
> +	unsigned long divisor;
>  	long long pos_ratio;
>  	long x;
>  
>  	divisor = limit - setpoint;
>  	if (!divisor)
> -		divisor = 1;
> +		divisor = 1;	/* Avoid div-by-zero */

Works for me :)

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>