From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9BE6B0036 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:36:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k48so15126289wev.12 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c19si5427681wiv.75.2014.08.26.10.36.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id b13so14704087wgh.18 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53FCC593.6020201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:36:19 +0300 From: Boaz Harrosh MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9 v2] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions References: <53EB5536.8020702@gmail.com> <53EB5709.4090401@plexistor.com> <53ECB480.4060104@plexistor.com> <1408997403.17731.7.camel@rzwisler-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com> <53FC42C5.6040300@plexistor.com> In-Reply-To: <53FC42C5.6040300@plexistor.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050203010809090701030701" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Boaz Harrosh , Ross Zwisler Cc: linux-fsdevel , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox , Sagi Manole , Yigal Korman This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050203010809090701030701 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/26/2014 11:18 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On 08/25/2014 11:10 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote: > <> >> I think we can still have a working probe by instead comparing the passed in >> dev_t against the dev_t we get back from disk_to_dev(prd->prd_disk), but I'd >> really like a use case so I can test this. Until then I think I'm just going >> to stub out prd/pmem_probe() with a BUG() so we can see if anyone hits it. >> >> It seems like this is preferable to just registering NULL for probe, as that >> would cause an oops in kobj_lookup(() when probe() is blindly called without >> checking for NULL. >> > > I have a version I think you will love it removes the probe and bunch of > other stuff. > > I tested it heavily it just works > > Comming soon, I'm preparing trees right now > Thanks > Boaz Ross hi It is getting late around here and I will not be pushing new trees tonight, first thing tomorrow morning. (Your last push caused me lots of extra work, you must not do like you did when working on a rebasing out-off-tree project involving more then one person, but more on the proper procedure tomorrow with the push of the trees) So I hope you are not doing any big changes, do not apply any of my patches just yet, wait for the new trees tomorrow please I have everything all ready on top of the rename to pmem Meanwhile without any explanations, these will come tomorrow, I'm attaching the most interesting bit which you have not seen before. If you want you can inspect a preview of what's to come here: http://git.open-osd.org/gitweb.cgi?p=pmem.git;a=summary I have created a new pmem.git tree just for us. Thanks Boaz --------------050203010809090701030701 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="0012-SQUASHME-pmem-KISS-remove-the-all-pmem_major-registr.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename*0="0012-SQUASHME-pmem-KISS-remove-the-all-pmem_major-registr.pa"; filename*1="tch" --------------050203010809090701030701--