From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2486B0035 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:02:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id em10so1915351wid.6 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c19si211540wiv.75.2014.09.17.13.02.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:02:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5419E89B.7020002@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:01:31 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Faults which trigger IO release the mmap_sem References: <1410811885-17267-1-git-send-email-andreslc@google.com> <54184078.4070505@redhat.com> <54188179.7010705@redhat.com> <54193BB2.8010500@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andres Lagar-Cavilla Cc: Gleb Natapov , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , Mel Gorman , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Sasha Levin , Jianyu Zhan , Paul Cassella , Hugh Dickins , Peter Feiner , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Il 17/09/2014 18:58, Andres Lagar-Cavilla ha scritto: > Understood. So in patch 1, would kvm_gup_retry be ... just a wrapper > around gup? That looks thin to me, and the naming of the function will > not be accurate. Depends on how you interpret "retry" ("with retry" vs. "retry after _fast"). :) My point was more to make possible future bisection easier, but I'm not going to insist. I'll queue the patch as soon as I get the required Acked-by. Paolo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org