From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickens <hughd@google.com>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: page allocator bug in 3.16?
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:34:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54255D58.1040802@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGvOkPq5LQR76-VbspYyCvUxL1=W-dLc4g_aWX2wkUmRpg@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/26/2014 02:28 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> wrote:
>> On 09/26/2014 12:40 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:15:57 +0200
>>> Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 09/26/2014 01:52 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>>>> On 09/25/2014 03:35 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>>>>> There are six ttm patches queued for 3.16.4:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drm-ttm-choose-a-pool-to-shrink-correctly-in-ttm_dma_pool_shrink_scan.patch
>>>>>> drm-ttm-fix-handling-of-ttm_pl_flag_topdown-v2.patch
>>>>>> drm-ttm-fix-possible-division-by-0-in-ttm_dma_pool_shrink_scan.patch
>>>>>> drm-ttm-fix-possible-stack-overflow-by-recursive-shrinker-calls.patch
>>>>>> drm-ttm-pass-gfp-flags-in-order-to-avoid-deadlock.patch
>>>>>> drm-ttm-use-mutex_trylock-to-avoid-deadlock-inside-shrinker-functions.patch
>>>>> Thanks for info, Chuck.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, none of these fix TTM dma allocation doing CMA dma allocation,
>>>>> which is the root problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Peter Hurley
>>>> The problem is not really in TTM but in CMA, There was a guy offering to
>>>> fix this in the CMA code but I guess he didn't probably because he
>>>> didn't receive any feedback.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, the "solution" to this problem seems to be "don't enable CMA on
>>> x86". Maybe it should even be disabled in the config system.
>> Or, as previously suggested, don't use CMA for order 0 (single page)
>> allocations....
> On devices that actually need CMA pools to arrange for memory to be in
> certain ranges, I think you probably do want to have order 0 pages
> come from the CMA pool.
But can the DMA subsystem or more specifically dma_alloc_coherent()
really guarantee such things? Isn't it better for such devices to use
CMA directly?
/Thomas
>
> Seems like disabling CMA on x86 (where it should be unneeded) is the
> better way, IMO
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>
>> /Thomas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel&k=oIvRg1%2BdGAgOoM1BIlLLqw%3D%3D%0A&r=l5Ago9ekmVFZ3c4M6eauqrJWGwjf6fTb%2BP3CxbBFkVM%3D%0A&m=Uz7JXDXYXp4RlLs7G6qxMQlhOOT0trW3l78xpKg6Ass%3D%0A&s=50d6b7b3bfd093c93a228437a3d4414e49b4de817657c49c35154a115a5c2188
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 18:55 page allocator bug in 3.16? Peter Hurley
2014-09-25 19:34 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-09-25 19:35 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-25 23:52 ` Peter Hurley
2014-09-26 7:15 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-09-26 10:40 ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-26 10:45 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2014-09-26 12:28 ` Rob Clark
2014-09-26 12:34 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2014-09-26 13:40 ` Rob Clark
2014-09-26 12:40 ` Rik van Riel
2014-09-26 14:10 ` Peter Hurley
2014-09-26 15:12 ` Leann Ogasawara
2014-09-27 14:15 ` Peter Hurley
2014-09-25 20:33 ` Alex Deucher
2014-09-25 21:10 ` Peter Hurley
2014-10-01 9:26 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2014-09-25 20:36 ` Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54255D58.1040802@vmware.com \
--to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cebbert.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).