linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert khugepaged to a task_work function
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 08:58:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544F9302.4010001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lho0pf4l.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>

On 10/28/2014 08:12 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com> writes:
> 
>> Last week, while discussing possible fixes for some unexpected/unwanted behavior
>> from khugepaged (see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/8/515) several people
>> mentioned possibly changing changing khugepaged to work as a task_work function
>> instead of a kernel thread.  This will give us finer grained control over the
>> page collapse scans, eliminate some unnecessary scans since tasks that are
>> relatively inactive will not be scanned often, and eliminate the unwanted
>> behavior described in the email thread I mentioned.
> 
> With your change, what would happen in a single threaded case?
> 
> Previously one core would scan and another would run the workload.
> With your change both scanning and running would be on the same
> core.
> 
> Would seem like a step backwards to me.

It's not just scanning, either.

Memory compaction can spend a lot of time waiting on
locks. Not consuming CPU or anything, but just waiting.

I am not convinced that moving all that waiting to task
context is a good idea.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-23  2:49 [PATCH 0/4] Convert khugepaged to a task_work function Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23  2:49 ` [PATCH 1/4] Disable khugepaged thread Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23  2:49 ` [PATCH] Add pgcollapse controls to task_struct Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23 15:29   ` Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23  2:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] Convert khugepaged scan functions to work with task_work Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23  2:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] Add /proc files to expose per-mm pgcollapse stats Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23  3:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add pgcollapse stat counter to task_struct Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23  3:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add /proc files to expose per-mm pgcollapse stats Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23 17:55 ` [PATCH 0/4] Convert khugepaged to a task_work function Rik van Riel
2014-10-23 18:05   ` Alex Thorlton
2014-10-23 18:52     ` Alex Thorlton
2014-10-28 12:12 ` Andi Kleen
2014-10-28 12:58   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-10-28 15:39     ` Rik van Riel
2014-10-31 20:27       ` Vlastimil Babka
2014-11-17 21:34         ` Alex Thorlton
2014-11-10 11:03     ` Mel Gorman
2014-11-17 21:16       ` Alex Thorlton
2014-10-29 21:58   ` Alex Thorlton
2014-10-30  0:23     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-10-30  8:35     ` Andi Kleen
2014-10-30 18:25       ` Alex Thorlton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=544F9302.4010001@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).