From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lauraa@codeaurora.org, gioh.kim@lge.com,
aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
mina86@mina86.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: DMA allocations from CMA and fatal_signal_pending check
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:08:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544FE9BE.6040503@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where
returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmcsysport.c, I came across the
fatal_signal_pending() check in mm/page_alloc.c which is there.
This driver calls dma_alloc_coherent(, GFP_KERNEL) which ends up making
a coherent allocation from a CMA region on our platform. Since that
allocation is allowed to sleep, and because we are in bcm_syport_open(),
executed from process context, a pending signal makes
dma_alloc_coherent() return NULL.
There are two ways I could fix this:
- use a GFP_ATOMIC allocation, which would avoid this sensitivity to a
pending signal being fatal (we suffer from the same issue in
bcm_sysport_resume)
- move the DMA coherent allocation before bcm_sysport_open(), in the
driver's probe function, but if the network interface is never used, we
would be waisting precious DMA coherent memory for nothing (it is only 4
bytes times 32 but still
Now the general problem that I see with this fatal_signal_pending()
check is that any driver that calls dma_alloc_coherent() and which does
this in a process context (network drivers are frequently doing this in
their ndo_open callback) and also happens to get its allocation serviced
from CMA can now fail, instead of failing on really hard OOM conditions.
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-28 19:08 Florian Fainelli [this message]
2014-10-31 8:28 ` DMA allocations from CMA and fatal_signal_pending check Joonsoo Kim
2014-10-31 20:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-11-03 16:45 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2014-11-03 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2014-10-31 21:07 ` Maxime Bizon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544FE9BE.6040503@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=gioh.kim@lge.com \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).