From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f177.google.com (mail-pd0-f177.google.com [209.85.192.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88860280011 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:38:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id v10so5912592pde.8 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com. [134.134.136.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id zt4si7673996pbb.132.2014.10.30.15.38.18 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5452BDD8.2080605@intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:38:16 -0700 From: Dave Hansen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/12] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound violation information References: <1413088915-13428-1-git-send-email-qiaowei.ren@intel.com> <1413088915-13428-10-git-send-email-qiaowei.ren@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1413088915-13428-10-git-send-email-qiaowei.ren@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Qiaowei Ren , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org > +void do_mpx_bounds(struct pt_regs *regs, siginfo_t *info, > + struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf) > +{ > + struct mpx_insn insn; > + uint8_t bndregno; > + unsigned long addr_vio; > + > + addr_vio = mpx_insn_decode(&insn, regs); > + > + bndregno = X86_MODRM_REG(insn.modrm.value); > + if (bndregno > 3) > + return; > + > + /* Note: the upper 32 bits are ignored in 32-bit mode. */ > + info->si_lower = (void __user *)(unsigned long) > + (xsave_buf->bndregs.bndregs[2*bndregno]); > + info->si_upper = (void __user *)(unsigned long) > + (~xsave_buf->bndregs.bndregs[2*bndregno+1]); > + info->si_addr_lsb = 0; > + info->si_signo = SIGSEGV; > + info->si_errno = 0; > + info->si_code = SEGV_BNDERR; > + info->si_addr = (void __user *)addr_vio; > +} > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c > index 611b6ec..b2a916b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c > @@ -284,6 +284,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_bounds(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) > unsigned long status; > struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf; > struct task_struct *tsk = current; > + siginfo_t info; > > prev_state = exception_enter(); > if (notify_die(DIE_TRAP, "bounds", regs, error_code, > @@ -316,6 +317,11 @@ dotraplinkage void do_bounds(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code) > break; > > case 1: /* Bound violation. */ > + do_mpx_bounds(regs, &info, xsave_buf); > + do_trap(X86_TRAP_BR, SIGSEGV, "bounds", regs, > + error_code, &info); > + break; > + > case 0: /* No exception caused by Intel MPX operations. */ > do_trap(X86_TRAP_BR, SIGSEGV, "bounds", regs, error_code, NULL); > break; > So, siginfo is stack-allocarted here. do_mpx_bounds() can error out if it sees an invalid bndregno. We still send the signal with the &info whether or not we filled the 'info' in do_mpx_bounds(). Can't this leak some kernel stack out in the 'info'? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org