From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ren Qiaowei <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.orgLinux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/12] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 12:53:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5457EB67.70904@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410272138540.5308@nanos>
On 10/27/2014 01:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Errm. Before user space can use the bounds table for the new mapping
> it needs to add the entries, right? So:
> 
> CPU 0					CPU 1
> 
> down_write(mm->bd_sem);
> mpx_pre_unmap();
>    clear bounds directory entries	
> unmap();
> 					map()
> 					write_bounds_entry()
> 					trap()
> 					  down_read(mm->bd_sem);
> mpx_post_unmap(); 
> up_write(mm->bd_sem);
> 					  allocate_bounds_table();
> 
> That's the whole point of bd_sem.
This does, indeed, seem to work for the normal munmap() cases.  However,
take a look at shmdt().  We don't know the size of the segment being
unmapped until after we acquire mmap_sem for write, so we wouldn't be
able to do do a mpx_pre_unmap() for those.
mremap() is similar.  We don't know if the area got expanded (and we
don't need to modify bounds tables) or moved (and we need to free the
old location's tables) until well after we've taken mmap_sem for write.
I propose we keep mm->bd_sem.  But, I think we need to keep a list
during each of the unmapping operations of VMAs that got unmapped, and
then keep them on a list without freeing then.  At up_write() time, we
look at the list, if it is empty, we just do an up_write() and we are done.
If *not* empty, downgrade_write(mm->mmap_sem), and do the work you
spelled out in mpx_pre_unmap() above: clear the bounds directory entries
and gather the VMAs while still holding mm->bd_sem for write.
Here's the other wrinkle: This would invert the ->bd_sem vs. ->mmap_sem
ordering (bd_sem nests outside mmap_sem with the above scheme).  We
_could_ always acquire bd_sem for write whenever mmap_sem is acquired,
although that seems a bit heavyweight.  I can't think of anything better
at the moment, though.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2014-11-03 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-12  4:41 [PATCH v9 00/12] Intel MPX support Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] x86, mpx: introduce VM_MPX to indicate that a VMA is MPX specific Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] x86, mpx: rename cfg_reg_u and status_reg Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] x86, mpx: add MPX specific mmap interface Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] x86, mpx: add MPX to disaabled features Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] x86, mpx: on-demand kernel allocation of bounds tables Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 12:08   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  3:20     ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-28 17:43     ` Dave Hansen
2014-10-28 17:57       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] mpx: extend siginfo structure to include bound violation information Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] mips: sync struct siginfo with general version Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] ia64: " Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] x86, mpx: decode MPX instruction to get bound violation information Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 12:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  1:43     ` Ren, Qiaowei
2014-10-27 20:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-28  5:58         ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-31 20:16         ` Dave Hansen
2014-10-31 20:33           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-30 22:38   ` Dave Hansen
2014-10-31  2:12     ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-31  9:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] x86, mpx: add prctl commands PR_MPX_ENABLE_MANAGEMENT, PR_MPX_DISABLE_MANAGEMENT Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 12:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-24 15:10     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  2:17     ` Ren, Qiaowei
2014-10-27 20:38       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-28  5:57         ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables Qiaowei Ren
2014-10-24 14:40   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-27  3:13     ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-27 20:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-28  5:56         ` Ren Qiaowei
2014-10-28 10:42           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-03 20:53         ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2014-11-03 21:29           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-04 16:00             ` Dave Hansen
2014-11-04 17:02               ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-06 21:50     ` Dave Hansen
2014-11-11 18:27       ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-11-11 20:44         ` Dave Hansen
2014-11-11 21:36           ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-12  4:41 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] x86, mpx: add documentation on Intel MPX Qiaowei Ren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5457EB67.70904@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.orgLinux-MM \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).