From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Andrea Argangeli <andrea@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Daniel Forrest <dan.forrest@ssec.wisc.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: anon_vma accumulating for certain load still not addressed
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:06:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54661A8C.5050806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141114130822.GC22857@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 11/14/2014 08:08 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi,
> back in 2012 [1] there was a discussion about a forking load which
> accumulates anon_vmas. There was a trivial test case which triggers this
> and can potentially deplete the memory by local user.
>
> We have a report for an older enterprise distribution where nsd is
> suffering from this issue most probably (I haven't debugged it throughly
> but accumulating anon_vma structs over time sounds like a good enough
> fit) and has to be restarted after some time to release the accumulated
> anon_vma objects.
>
> There was a patch which tried to work around the issue [2] but I do not
> see any follow ups nor any indication that the issue would be addressed
> in other way.
>
> The test program from [1] was running for around 39 mins on my laptop
> and here is the result:
>
> $ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
> 1415960225
> anon_vma 11664 11900 160 25 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 476 476 0
>
> $ ./a # The reproducer
>
> $ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
> 1415962592
> anon_vma 34875 34875 160 25 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 1395 1395 0
>
> $ killall a
> $ date +%s; grep anon_vma /proc/slabinfo
> 1415962607
> anon_vma 11277 12175 160 25 1 : tunables 0 0 0 : slabdata 487 487 0
>
> So we have accumulated 23211 objects over that time period before the
> offender was killed which released all of them.
>
> The proposed workaround is kind of ugly but do people have a better idea
> than reference counting? If not should we merge it?
I believe we should just merge that patch.
I have not seen any better ideas come by.
The comment should probably be fixed to reflect the
chain length of 5 though :)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-14 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-14 13:08 anon_vma accumulating for certain load still not addressed Michal Hocko
2014-11-14 15:06 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-11-14 17:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54661A8C.5050806@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.forrest@ssec.wisc.edu \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).