From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCE76B0038 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:54:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id tp5so9771222ieb.26 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:54:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (smtp.codeaurora.org. [198.145.11.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c88si10734301iod.26.2014.11.24.17.54.15 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:54:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5473E146.7000503@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:54:14 -0800 From: Laura Abbott MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Improving CMA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: zhuhui@xiaomi.com, minchan@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, gioh.kim@lge.com, SeongJae Park There have been a number of patch series posted designed to improve various aspects of CMA. A sampling: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/15/623 http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=141571797202006&w=2 https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/26/549 As far as I can tell, these are all trying to fix real problems with CMA but none of them have moved forward very much from what I can tell. The goal of this session would be to come out with an agreement on what are the biggest problems with CMA and the best ways to solve them. Thanks, Laura -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org