From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] kstrdup optimization
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:54:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AE61F6.808@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141230212915.GN2915@two.firstfloor.org>
Hi Andi, Andreas,
Thanks for comments.
On 12/30/2014 10:29 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> This symmetry issue probably could be cleanly avoided only
>> by having kfree() itself contain such an identifying check, as you suggest
>> (thereby slowing down kfree() performance).
>
> It actually shouldn't slow it down. kfree already complains if you free
> a non slab page, this could be just in front of the error check.
>
> The bigger concern is that it may hide some programing errors elsewhere
> though. So it's probably better to keep it a separate function.
Shall I interpret it as preliminary ack?
If yes, I can repost it without RFC prefix. Anyway I need to:
- add EXPORT_SYMBOL(kstrdup_const),
- add kerneldocs for both functions.
I can also add patch constifying mnt->mnt_devname in alloc_vfsmnt,
on my test platform it could save 13 additional allocations.
Regards
Andrzej
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-08 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-29 14:48 [RFC PATCH 0/4] kstrdup optimization Andrzej Hajda
2014-12-29 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/util: add kstrdup_const Andrzej Hajda
2014-12-29 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] kernfs: use kstrdup_const for node name allocation Andrzej Hajda
2014-12-29 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] clk: use kstrdup_const for clock name allocations Andrzej Hajda
2014-12-29 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm/slab: use kstrdup_const for allocating cache names Andrzej Hajda
2014-12-30 6:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] kstrdup optimization Andi Kleen
2014-12-30 7:16 ` Andrzej Hajda
2014-12-30 8:32 ` Andreas Mohr
2014-12-30 21:29 ` Andi Kleen
2015-01-08 10:54 ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2014-12-31 13:05 ` Andrzej Hajda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AE61F6.808@samsung.com \
--to=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).