linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Xiexiuqi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	yasu.ishimatsu@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] memory-hotplug: fix BUG_ON in move_freepages()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:45:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55346859.30605@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55345979.2020502@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2015/4/20 9:42, Gu Zheng wrote:

> Hi Xishi,
> On 04/18/2015 04:05 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> 
>>
>> Your patches will fix your issue.
>> But, if BIOS reports memory first at node hot add, pgdat can
>> not be initialized.
>>
>> Memory hot add flows are as follows:
>>
>> add_memory
>>   ...
>>   -> hotadd_new_pgdat()
>>   ...
>>   -> node_set_online(nid)
>>
>> When calling hotadd_new_pgdat() for a hot added node, the node is
>> offline because node_set_online() is not called yet. So if applying
>> your patches, the pgdat is not initialized in this case.
> 
> Ishimtasu's worry is reasonable. And I am afraid the fix here is a bit
> over-kill. 
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>>
>> On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:50:32 +0800
>> Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hot remove nodeXX, then hot add nodeXX. If BIOS report cpu first, it will call
>>> hotadd_new_pgdat(nid, 0), this will set pgdat->node_start_pfn to 0. As nodeXX
>>> exists at boot time, so pgdat->node_spanned_pages is the same as original. Then
>>> free_area_init_core()->memmap_init() will pass a wrong start and a nonzero size.
> 
> As your analysis said the root cause here is passing a *0* as the node_start_pfn,
> then the chaos occurred when init the zones. And this only happens to the re-hotadd
> node, so how about using the saved *node_start_pfn* (via get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn))
> instead if we find "pgdat->node_start_pfn == 0 && !node_online(XXX)"?
> 
> Thanks,
> Gu
> 

Hi Gu,

I first considered this method, but if the hot added node's start and size are different
from before, it makes the chaos.

e.g.
nodeXX (8-16G)
remove nodeXX 
BIOS report cpu first and online it
hotadd nodeXX
use the original value, so pgdat->node_start_pfn is set to 8G, and size is 8G
BIOS report mem(10-12G)
call add_memory()->__add_zone()->grow_zone_span()/grow_pgdat_span()
the start is still 8G, not 10G, this is chaos!

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-20  3:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-17 10:50 [PATCH 1/2 V2] memory-hotplug: fix BUG_ON in move_freepages() Xishi Qiu
2015-04-17 20:05 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-04-20  1:33   ` Xishi Qiu
2015-04-20  1:56     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-04-20  2:11     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-04-20  2:08       ` Gu Zheng
2015-04-20  2:09       ` Gu Zheng
2015-04-20  2:59         ` Xishi Qiu
2015-04-20  3:15           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-04-20  3:34             ` Xishi Qiu
2015-04-20  2:23     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-04-20  1:42   ` Gu Zheng
2015-04-20  2:45     ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2015-04-20  3:29       ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-04-20  3:42         ` Xishi Qiu
2015-04-20 18:23           ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-04-21  1:31             ` Xishi Qiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55346859.30605@huawei.com \
    --to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=yasu.ishimatsu@gmail.com \
    --cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).