From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@01.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [mmotm:master 229/385] fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:578:13: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy'
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:25:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55B6777F.2050706@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150727071333.GC11317@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 07/27/2015 12:13 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 24-07-15 10:27:02, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> On 07/23/2015 03:18 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> tree: git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git master
>>> head: 61f5f835b6f06fbc233481b5d3c0afd71ecf54e8
>>> commit: 0c5e1e8ed55974975bb829e4b93cf19aa0dfcafc [229/385] hugetlbfs: add hugetlbfs_fallocate()
>>> config: i386-randconfig-r0-201529 (attached as .config)
>>> reproduce:
>>> git checkout 0c5e1e8ed55974975bb829e4b93cf19aa0dfcafc
>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>> make ARCH=i386
>>>
>>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>
>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: In function 'hugetlbfs_fallocate':
>>>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:578:13: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy'
>>> pseudo_vma.vm_policy =
>>> ^
>>>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:579:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'mpol_shared_policy_lookup' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>> mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&HUGETLBFS_I(inode)->policy,
>>> ^
>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:595:28: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy'
>>> mpol_cond_put(pseudo_vma.vm_policy);
>>> ^
>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:601:27: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy'
>>> mpol_cond_put(pseudo_vma.vm_policy);
>>> ^
>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>>
>>> vim +578 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>>
>>> 572 if (signal_pending(current)) {
>>> 573 error = -EINTR;
>>> 574 break;
>>> 575 }
>>> 576
>>> 577 /* Get policy based on index */
>>> > 578 pseudo_vma.vm_policy =
>>> > 579 mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&HUGETLBFS_I(inode)->policy,
>>> 580 index);
>>> 581
>>> 582 /* addr is the offset within the file (zero based) */
>>>
>>> ---
>>> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
>>> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
>>>
>>
>> Michal already added a patch to mmotm. The patch below is functionally
>> equivalent but moves the #ifdef out of the executable code path, and
>> modifies a comment. This has been functional/stress tested in a kernel
>> without CONFIG_NUMA defined.
>
> I will drop my quick hack once Andrew picks your patch which is indeed
> better.
>
> One nit below...
>
>> hugetlbfs: build fix fallocate if not CONFIG_NUMA
>>
>> When fallocate preallocation allocates pages, it will use the
>> defined numa policy. However, if numa is not defined there is
>> no such policy and no code should reference numa policy. Create
>> wrappers to isolate policy manipulation code that are NOOP in
>> the non-NUMA case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> index d977cae..4bae359 100644
>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> @@ -85,6 +85,29 @@ static const match_table_t tokens = {
>> {Opt_err, NULL},
>> };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>> +static inline void hugetlb_set_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
>> +{
>> + vma->vm_policy = mpol_shared_policy_lookup(&HUGETLBFS_I(inode)->policy,
>> + index);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void hugetlb_vma_mpol_cond_put(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>
> The naming could be better. What about hugetlb_drop_vma_policy to be
> symmetric to hugetlb_set_vma_policy. Or is there any reason to expose
> that this is a cond_put?
>
I like the name. Will send an updated patch with the change.
--
Mike Kravetz
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 22:18 [mmotm:master 229/385] fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:578:13: error: 'struct vm_area_struct' has no member named 'vm_policy' kbuild test robot
2015-07-24 0:21 ` Mike Kravetz
2015-07-24 17:27 ` Mike Kravetz
2015-07-27 7:13 ` Michal Hocko
2015-07-27 18:25 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55B6777F.2050706@oracle.com \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).