From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@suse.de, mhocko@kernel.org,
js1304@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com, sasha.levin@oracle.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: add a helper function to check page before alloc/free
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:19:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EF34AB.5040003@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440679917-3507-1-git-send-email-bywxiaobai@163.com>
On 08/27/2015 02:51 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> The major portion of check_new_page() and free_pages_check() are same,
> introduce a helper function check_one_page() for simplification.
>
> Change in v3:
> - add the missed __PG_HWPOISON check per Michal Hocko
> Change in v2:
> - use bad_flags as parameter directly per Michal Hocko
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 5b5240b..0c9c82a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -707,10 +707,9 @@ out:
> zone->free_area[order].nr_free++;
> }
>
> -static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> +static inline int check_one_page(struct page *page, unsigned long bad_flags)
> {
> const char *bad_reason = NULL;
> - unsigned long bad_flags = 0;
>
> if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page)))
> bad_reason = "nonzero mapcount";
> @@ -718,9 +717,16 @@ static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> bad_reason = "non-NULL mapping";
> if (unlikely(atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0))
> bad_reason = "nonzero _count";
> - if (unlikely(page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE)) {
> - bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set";
> - bad_flags = PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE;
> + if (bad_flags == PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP) {
> + if (unlikely(page->flags & bad_flags))
> + bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP flag set";
> + if (unlikely(page->flags & __PG_HWPOISON)) {
> + bad_reason = "HWPoisoned (hardware-corrupted)";
> + bad_flags = __PG_HWPOISON;
> + }
Before, HWPOISON was checked first, which means that it had lower priority than
PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP (counter-intuitively). I can see why you switched that
though. You could fix that by changing the second nested "if" to "else if", but
I guess it doesn't matter. The "priorities" don't seem to be carefuly sorted anyway.
bloat-o-meter looks favorably with my gcc, although there shouldn't be a real
reason for it, as the inlining didn't change:
add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 1/1 up/down: 285/-336 (-51)
function old new delta
bad_page - 276 +276
get_page_from_freelist 2521 2530 +9
free_pages_prepare 745 667 -78
bad_page.part 258 - -258
With that,
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> + } else if (bad_flags == PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE) {
> + if (unlikely(page->flags & bad_flags))
> + bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag set";
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> if (unlikely(page->mem_cgroup))
> @@ -730,6 +736,17 @@ static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> bad_page(page, bad_reason, bad_flags);
> return 1;
> }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = check_one_page(page, PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> page_cpupid_reset_last(page);
> if (page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP)
> page->flags &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> @@ -1287,32 +1304,7 @@ static inline void expand(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
> */
> static inline int check_new_page(struct page *page)
> {
> - const char *bad_reason = NULL;
> - unsigned long bad_flags = 0;
> -
> - if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page)))
> - bad_reason = "nonzero mapcount";
> - if (unlikely(page->mapping != NULL))
> - bad_reason = "non-NULL mapping";
> - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0))
> - bad_reason = "nonzero _count";
> - if (unlikely(page->flags & __PG_HWPOISON)) {
> - bad_reason = "HWPoisoned (hardware-corrupted)";
> - bad_flags = __PG_HWPOISON;
> - }
> - if (unlikely(page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP)) {
> - bad_reason = "PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP flag set";
> - bad_flags = PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> - }
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> - if (unlikely(page->mem_cgroup))
> - bad_reason = "page still charged to cgroup";
> -#endif
> - if (unlikely(bad_reason)) {
> - bad_page(page, bad_reason, bad_flags);
> - return 1;
> - }
> - return 0;
> + return check_one_page(page, PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP);
> }
>
> static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_flags,
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-08 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 12:51 [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: add a helper function to check page before alloc/free Yaowei Bai
2015-09-08 19:19 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2015-09-09 13:28 ` Yaowei Bai
2015-09-09 13:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-09-09 14:41 ` Yaowei Bai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55EF34AB.5040003@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
--cc=bywxiaobai@163.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).