From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
zhongjiang@huawei.com, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa-balancing: fix confusion in /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:34:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F775C1.6010808@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150914074317.GA8966@gmail.com>
On 2015/9/14 15:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> We can only echo 0 or 1 > "/proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing", usually 1 means
>> enable and 0 means disable. But when echo 1, it shows the value is 65536, this
>> is confusion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 3595403..e97a348 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ int sysctl_numa_balancing(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>> {
>> struct ctl_table t;
>> int err;
>> - int state = numabalancing_enabled;
>> + int state = !!numabalancing_enabled;
>>
>> if (write && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>> return -EPERM;
>
> So in the latest scheduler tree this variable got renamed, please adjust your
> patch:
>
> git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
>
Hi Ingo,
I tested the latest kernel in the above tree, it seems that the problem has
been fixed. So please drop this patch.
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 6:25 [PATCH] numa-balancing: fix confusion in /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing Xishi Qiu
2015-09-14 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-15 1:34 ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F775C1.6010808@huawei.com \
--to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).