From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mgorman@suse.de, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, luto@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
yue.li@memverge.com, Ravikumar.Bangoria@amd.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 21:00:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55a344fa-4325-e82d-eeaa-1a77611ff513@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87356m8jo1.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 03-Mar-23 11:23 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>
> What is the memory accessing pattern of the workload? Uniform random or
> something like Gauss distribution?
Multiple iterations of uniform access from beginning to end of the
memory region.
>
> Anyway, it may take some time for the original method to scan enough
> memory space to trigger enough hint page fault. We can check
> numa_pte_updates to check whether enough virtual space has been scanned.
I see that numa_hint_faults is way higher (sometimes close to 5 times)
than numa_pte_updates. This doesn't make sense. Very rarely I do see
saner numbers and when that happens the benchmark score is also much better.
Looks like an issue with the default kernel itself. I will debug this
further and get back.
Regards,
Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-08 7:35 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] x86/ibs: In-kernel IBS driver for page access profiling Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] x86/ibs: Drive NUMA balancing via IBS access data Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] x86/ibs: Enable per-process IBS from sched switch path Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] x86/ibs: Adjust access faults sampling period Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86/ibs: Delay the collection of HW-provided access info Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-08 18:12 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-09 6:04 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-09 14:28 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-10 4:28 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-10 4:40 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-10 15:10 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-09 5:57 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-13 2:56 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-13 3:23 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-13 3:34 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-13 3:26 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-13 5:52 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-13 6:30 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-14 4:55 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-15 6:07 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-24 3:28 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-16 8:41 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-17 6:03 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-24 3:36 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-27 7:54 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-01 11:21 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-03-02 8:10 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-03 5:25 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-03-03 5:53 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-06 15:30 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2023-03-07 2:33 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55a344fa-4325-e82d-eeaa-1a77611ff513@amd.com \
--to=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=Ravikumar.Bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yue.li@memverge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox