From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch V3 2/9] kernel/profile.c: Replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node()
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:35:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56172807.4090906@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1508191657330.30666@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 2015/8/20 8:00, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>> On 2015/8/18 8:31, David Rientjes wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Function profile_cpu_callback() allocates memory without specifying
>>>> __GFP_THISNODE flag, so replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node()
>>>> because cpu_to_mem() may cause suboptimal memory allocation if
>>>> there's no free memory on the node returned by cpu_to_mem().
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why is cpu_to_node() better with regard to free memory and NUMA locality?
>> Hi David,
>> Thanks for review. This is a special case pointed out by Tejun.
>> For the imagined topology, A<->B<->X<->C<->D, where A, B, C, D has
>> memory and X is memoryless.
>> Possible fallback lists are:
>> B: [ B, A, C, D]
>> X: [ B, C, A, D]
>> C: [ C, D, B, A]
>>
>> cpu_to_mem(X) will either return B or C. Let's assume it returns B.
>> Then we will use "B: [ B, A, C, D]" to allocate memory for X, which
>> is not the optimal fallback list for X. And cpu_to_node(X) returns
>> X, and "X: [ B, C, A, D]" is the optimal fallback list for X.
>
> Ok, that makes sense, but I would prefer that this
> alloc_pages_exact_node() change to alloc_pages_node() since, as you
> mention in your commit message, __GFP_THISNODE is not set.
Hi David,
Sorry for slow response due to personal reasons!
Function alloc_pages_exact_node() has been renamed as
__alloc_pages_node() by commit 96db800f5d73, and __alloc_pages_node()
is a slightly optimized version of alloc_pages_node() which doesn't
fallback to current node for nid == NUMA_NO_NODE case. So it would
be better to keep using __alloc_pages_node() because cpu_to_node()
always returns valid node id.
Thanks!
Gerry
>
> In the longterm, if we setup both zonelists correctly (no __GFP_THISNODE
> and with __GFP_THISNODE), then I'm not sure there's any reason to ever use
> cpu_to_mem() for alloc_pages().
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-17 3:18 [Patch V3 0/9] Enable memoryless node support for x86 Jiang Liu
2015-08-17 3:18 ` [Patch V3 1/9] x86, NUMA, ACPI: Online node earlier when doing CPU hot-addition Jiang Liu
2015-08-17 3:18 ` [Patch V3 2/9] kernel/profile.c: Replace cpu_to_mem() with cpu_to_node() Jiang Liu
2015-08-18 0:31 ` David Rientjes
2015-08-19 7:18 ` Jiang Liu
2015-08-20 0:00 ` David Rientjes
2015-10-09 2:35 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2015-08-17 3:19 ` [Patch V3 3/9] sgi-xp: Replace cpu_to_node() with cpu_to_mem() to support memoryless node Jiang Liu
2015-08-18 0:25 ` David Rientjes
2015-08-19 8:20 ` Jiang Liu
2015-08-20 0:02 ` David Rientjes
2015-08-20 6:36 ` Jiang Liu
2015-10-09 5:04 ` Jiang Liu
2015-08-19 11:52 ` Robin Holt
2015-08-19 12:45 ` Jiang Liu
2015-08-17 3:19 ` [Patch V3 4/9] openvswitch: " Jiang Liu
2015-08-18 0:14 ` Pravin Shelar
2015-08-17 3:19 ` [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better " Jiang Liu
2015-08-18 0:35 ` David Rientjes
2015-08-19 22:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Patil, Kiran
2015-08-20 0:18 ` David Rientjes
2015-10-08 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
2015-10-09 5:52 ` Jiang Liu
2015-10-09 9:08 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2015-10-09 9:25 ` Jiang Liu
2015-08-17 3:19 ` [Patch V3 6/9] i40evf: " Jiang Liu
2015-08-17 19:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Patil, Kiran
2015-08-18 21:34 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-08-17 3:19 ` [Patch V3 7/9] x86, numa: Kill useless code to improve code readability Jiang Liu
2015-08-17 3:19 ` [Patch V3 8/9] mm: Update _mem_id_[] for every possible CPU when memory configuration changes Jiang Liu
2015-08-17 3:19 ` [Patch V3 9/9] mm, x86: Enable memoryless node support to better support CPU/memory hotplug Jiang Liu
2015-08-18 6:11 ` Tang Chen
2015-08-18 6:59 ` Jiang Liu
2015-08-18 11:28 ` Tang Chen
2015-08-18 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-17 21:35 ` [Patch V3 0/9] Enable memoryless node support for x86 Andrew Morton
2015-08-18 10:02 ` Tang Chen
2015-08-19 8:09 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56172807.4090906@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).