From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/3] s390: query dynamic DEBUG_PAGEALLOC setting
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:59:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56A878CF.7090507@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160127005920.GB7089@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
On 01/27/2016 01:59 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:36:11PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>
>>>> I'd agree if CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC only did anything when
>>>> debug_pagealloc_enabled() is true, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
>>>> When CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is enabled, for instance, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>>>> also enables stackinfo storing and poisoning and it's not guarded by
>>>> debug_pagealloc_enabled().
>>>>
>>>> It seems like CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enables debugging functionality
>>>> outside the scope of the debug_pagealloc=on kernel parameter, so
>>>> DEBUG_PAGEALLOC(disabled) actually does mean something.
>>>
>>> Hello, David.
>>>
>>> I tried to fix CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB case on 04/16 of following patchset.
>>>
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/144527
>>>
>>> I found that there are more sites to fix but not so many.
>>> We can do it.
>>>
>>
>> For the slab case, sure, this can be fixed, but there is other code that
>> uses CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC to suggest debugging is always enabled and is
>> indifferent to debug_pagealloc_enabled(). I find this in powerpc and
>> sparc arch code as well as generic vmalloc code.
>
> Yes, I also found it.
>
>>
>> If we can convert existing users that only check for
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC to rather check for debug_pagealloc_enabled() and
>> agree that it is only enabled for debug_pagealloc=on, then this would seem
>> fine. However, I think we should at least consult with those users before
>> removing an artifact from the kernel log that could be useful in debugging
>> why a particular BUG() happened.
>
> Yes, at least, non-architecture dependent code (vmalloc, SLAB, SLUB) should
> be changed first. If Christian doesn't mind, I will try to fix above 3
> things.
Ok. So I will change this as Heiko and Thomas suggested for s390 and x86 and
resend these 3 patches. Feel free to work on the other areas.
Christian
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-26 9:18 [PATCH/RFC 0/3] Optimize CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-26 9:18 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] mm: provide debug_pagealloc_enabled() without CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-26 23:23 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-26 9:18 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] x86: query dynamic DEBUG_PAGEALLOC setting Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-26 9:18 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] s390: " Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-26 18:19 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-01-26 20:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-26 23:29 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-27 0:19 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-01-27 0:36 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-27 0:59 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-01-27 7:59 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2016-01-27 12:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-27 12:47 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-27 13:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-27 13:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-28 4:25 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56A878CF.7090507@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).