linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:34:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DEE2FD.4000105@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457444565-10524-4-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>

On 03/08/2016 02:42 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> should_reclaim_retry will give up retries for higher order allocations
> if none of the eligible zones has any requested or higher order pages
> available even if we pass the watermak check for order-0. This is done
> because there is no guarantee that the reclaimable and currently free
> pages will form the required order.
> 
> This can, however, lead to situations were the high-order request (e.g.
> order-2 required for the stack allocation during fork) will trigger
> OOM too early - e.g. after the first reclaim/compaction round. Such a
> system would have to be highly fragmented and there is no guarantee
> further reclaim/compaction attempts would help but at least make sure
> that the compaction was active before we go OOM and keep retrying even
> if should_reclaim_retry tells us to oom if the last compaction round
> was either inactive (deferred, skipped or bailed out early due to
> contention) or it told us to continue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/compaction.h |  5 +++++
>  mm/page_alloc.c            | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
> index b167801187e7..49e04326dcb8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compaction.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ enum compact_result {
>  	/* compaction should continue to another pageblock */
>  	COMPACT_CONTINUE,
>  	/*
> +	 * whoever is calling compaction should retry because it was either
> +	 * not active or it tells us there is more work to be done.
> +	 */
> +	COMPACT_SHOULD_RETRY = COMPACT_CONTINUE,

Hmm, I'm not sure about this. AFAIK compact_zone() doesn't ever return
COMPACT_CONTINUE, and thus try_to_compact_pages() also doesn't. This
overloading of CONTINUE only applies to compaction_suitable(). But the
value that should_compact_retry() is testing comes only from
try_to_compact_pages(). So this is not wrong, but perhaps a bit misleading?

> +	/*
>  	 * direct compaction partially compacted a zone and there are suitable
>  	 * pages
>  	 */
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 4acc0aa1aee0..041aeb1dc3b4 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2819,28 +2819,20 @@ static struct page *
>  __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		int alloc_flags, const struct alloc_context *ac,
>  		enum migrate_mode mode, int *contended_compaction,
> -		bool *deferred_compaction)
> +		enum compact_result *compact_result)
>  {
> -	enum compact_result compact_result;
>  	struct page *page;
>  
>  	if (!order)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> -	compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> +	*compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
>  						mode, contended_compaction);
>  	current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
>  
> -	switch (compact_result) {
> -	case COMPACT_DEFERRED:
> -		*deferred_compaction = true;
> -		/* fall-through */
> -	case COMPACT_SKIPPED:
> +	if (*compact_result <= COMPACT_SKIPPED)
>  		return NULL;
> -	default:
> -		break;
> -	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * At least in one zone compaction wasn't deferred or skipped, so let's
> @@ -2870,15 +2862,41 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool
> + (unsigned int order, enum compact_result compact_result,
> +		     int contended_compaction)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * !costly allocations are really important and we have to make sure
> +	 * the compaction wasn't deferred or didn't bail out early due to locks
> +	 * contention before we go OOM.
> +	 */
> +	if (order && order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
> +		if (compact_result <= COMPACT_SHOULD_RETRY)
> +			return true;
> +		if (contended_compaction > COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
>  #else
>  static inline struct page *
>  __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		int alloc_flags, const struct alloc_context *ac,
>  		enum migrate_mode mode, int *contended_compaction,
> -		bool *deferred_compaction)
> +		enum compact_result *compact_result)
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool
> +should_compact_retry(unsigned int order, enum compact_result compact_result,
> +		     int contended_compaction)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
>  
>  /* Perform direct synchronous page reclaim */
> @@ -3118,7 +3136,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	int alloc_flags;
>  	unsigned long did_some_progress;
>  	enum migrate_mode migration_mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
> -	bool deferred_compaction = false;
> +	enum compact_result compact_result;
>  	int contended_compaction = COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
>  	int no_progress_loops = 0;
>  
> @@ -3227,7 +3245,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
>  					migration_mode,
>  					&contended_compaction,
> -					&deferred_compaction);
> +					&compact_result);
>  	if (page)
>  		goto got_pg;
>  
> @@ -3240,7 +3258,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		 * to heavily disrupt the system, so we fail the allocation
>  		 * instead of entering direct reclaim.
>  		 */
> -		if (deferred_compaction)
> +		if (compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
>  			goto nopage;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -3294,6 +3312,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  				 did_some_progress > 0, no_progress_loops))
>  		goto retry;
>  
> +	if (should_compact_retry(order, compact_result, contended_compaction))
> +		goto retry;
> +
>  	/* Reclaim has failed us, start killing things */
>  	page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order, ac, &did_some_progress);
>  	if (page)
> @@ -3314,7 +3335,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags,
>  					    ac, migration_mode,
>  					    &contended_compaction,
> -					    &deferred_compaction);
> +					    &compact_result);
>  	if (page)
>  		goto got_pg;
>  nopage:
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-08 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15 18:19 [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Michal Hocko
2015-12-15 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, oom: rework oom detection Michal Hocko
2016-01-14 22:58   ` David Rientjes
2016-01-16  1:07     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-19 22:48       ` David Rientjes
2016-01-20 11:13         ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-20 13:13           ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  8:23   ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-04-04  9:42     ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-15 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages Michal Hocko
2016-03-17 11:35   ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-17 12:01     ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-15 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: use watermak checks for __GFP_REPEAT high order allocations Michal Hocko
2015-12-16 23:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Andrew Morton
2015-12-18 12:12   ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-16 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-18 13:15   ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-18 16:35     ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-24 12:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-12-28 12:08   ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-12-28 14:13     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-06 12:44       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-08 12:37       ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-29 16:32     ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-30 15:05       ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-02 15:47         ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-20 12:24           ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-27 23:18             ` David Rientjes
2016-01-28 21:19               ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-29 16:27   ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 20:40 ` [PATCH 4/3] mm, oom: drop the last allocation attempt before out_of_memory Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 21:36   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-28 23:19     ` David Rientjes
2016-01-28 23:51       ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-29 10:39         ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-29 15:32         ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-30 12:18           ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-29 15:23       ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-29 15:24     ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 21:19 ` [PATCH 5/3] mm, vmscan: make zone_reclaimable_pages more precise Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 23:20   ` David Rientjes
2016-01-29  3:41   ` Hillf Danton
2016-01-29 10:35   ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-29 15:17     ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-29 21:30       ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-03 13:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 22:58   ` David Rientjes
2016-02-04 12:57     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-04 13:10       ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-04 13:39         ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-04 14:24           ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-07  4:09           ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-15 20:06             ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-16 13:10               ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-16 15:19                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-25  3:47   ` Hugh Dickins
2016-02-25  6:48     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-25  9:17       ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-25  9:27         ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-25  9:48           ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-25 11:02             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-25  9:23     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-26  6:32       ` Hugh Dickins
2016-02-26  7:54         ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-26  9:24           ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-26 10:27             ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-26 13:49               ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-26  9:33         ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 21:02       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02  2:19         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02  9:50           ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 13:32             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 14:06               ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 14:34                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-03  9:26                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-03 10:29                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-03 14:10                     ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-03 15:25                       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-04  5:23                         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 15:15                           ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-04 17:39                             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-07  5:23                             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-03 15:50                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-03 16:26                         ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-04  7:10                         ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 15:01             ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-07 16:08         ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko
2016-03-08  3:51           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08  9:08             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08  9:24               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08  9:24           ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08  9:32             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08  9:46             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08  9:52               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 10:10                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 11:12                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 12:22                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 12:29                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08  9:58           ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08 13:57             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 10:36           ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-08 13:42           ` [PATCH 0/2] oom rework: high order enahncements Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 13:42             ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 14:19               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09  3:55               ` Hillf Danton
2016-03-08 13:42             ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 14:22               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09  3:57               ` Hillf Danton
2016-03-08 13:42             ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 14:34               ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-03-08 14:48                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 15:03                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09 11:11               ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-09 14:07                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-11 12:17                 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-11 13:06                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 19:08                     ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-14 16:21                       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 15:19           ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-08 16:05             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 17:03               ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-09 10:41                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 14:53                   ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-11 15:20                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 20:35     ` [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Michal Hocko
2016-03-01  7:29       ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-01 13:38         ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 14:40           ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 18:14           ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-02  2:55             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 12:37               ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 14:06                 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 12:24             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 13:00               ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 13:22               ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-02  2:28           ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 12:39             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-03  9:54           ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-03 12:32             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-03 20:57               ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-04  7:41                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-04  7:53             ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 12:28             ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 10:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-11 13:08   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 13:32     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-11 15:28       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 16:49         ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-11 17:00           ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 17:20             ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-12  4:08               ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-13 14:41                 ` Tetsuo Handa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56DEE2FD.4000105@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).