From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:34:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DEE2FD.4000105@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457444565-10524-4-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org>
On 03/08/2016 02:42 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> should_reclaim_retry will give up retries for higher order allocations
> if none of the eligible zones has any requested or higher order pages
> available even if we pass the watermak check for order-0. This is done
> because there is no guarantee that the reclaimable and currently free
> pages will form the required order.
>
> This can, however, lead to situations were the high-order request (e.g.
> order-2 required for the stack allocation during fork) will trigger
> OOM too early - e.g. after the first reclaim/compaction round. Such a
> system would have to be highly fragmented and there is no guarantee
> further reclaim/compaction attempts would help but at least make sure
> that the compaction was active before we go OOM and keep retrying even
> if should_reclaim_retry tells us to oom if the last compaction round
> was either inactive (deferred, skipped or bailed out early due to
> contention) or it told us to continue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> include/linux/compaction.h | 5 +++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h
> index b167801187e7..49e04326dcb8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compaction.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compaction.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ enum compact_result {
> /* compaction should continue to another pageblock */
> COMPACT_CONTINUE,
> /*
> + * whoever is calling compaction should retry because it was either
> + * not active or it tells us there is more work to be done.
> + */
> + COMPACT_SHOULD_RETRY = COMPACT_CONTINUE,
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. AFAIK compact_zone() doesn't ever return
COMPACT_CONTINUE, and thus try_to_compact_pages() also doesn't. This
overloading of CONTINUE only applies to compaction_suitable(). But the
value that should_compact_retry() is testing comes only from
try_to_compact_pages(). So this is not wrong, but perhaps a bit misleading?
> + /*
> * direct compaction partially compacted a zone and there are suitable
> * pages
> */
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 4acc0aa1aee0..041aeb1dc3b4 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2819,28 +2819,20 @@ static struct page *
> __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> int alloc_flags, const struct alloc_context *ac,
> enum migrate_mode mode, int *contended_compaction,
> - bool *deferred_compaction)
> + enum compact_result *compact_result)
> {
> - enum compact_result compact_result;
> struct page *page;
>
> if (!order)
> return NULL;
>
> current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC;
> - compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> + *compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> mode, contended_compaction);
> current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
>
> - switch (compact_result) {
> - case COMPACT_DEFERRED:
> - *deferred_compaction = true;
> - /* fall-through */
> - case COMPACT_SKIPPED:
> + if (*compact_result <= COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> return NULL;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
>
> /*
> * At least in one zone compaction wasn't deferred or skipped, so let's
> @@ -2870,15 +2862,41 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool
> + (unsigned int order, enum compact_result compact_result,
> + int contended_compaction)
> +{
> + /*
> + * !costly allocations are really important and we have to make sure
> + * the compaction wasn't deferred or didn't bail out early due to locks
> + * contention before we go OOM.
> + */
> + if (order && order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
> + if (compact_result <= COMPACT_SHOULD_RETRY)
> + return true;
> + if (contended_compaction > COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE)
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> #else
> static inline struct page *
> __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> int alloc_flags, const struct alloc_context *ac,
> enum migrate_mode mode, int *contended_compaction,
> - bool *deferred_compaction)
> + enum compact_result *compact_result)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool
> +should_compact_retry(unsigned int order, enum compact_result compact_result,
> + int contended_compaction)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
>
> /* Perform direct synchronous page reclaim */
> @@ -3118,7 +3136,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> int alloc_flags;
> unsigned long did_some_progress;
> enum migrate_mode migration_mode = MIGRATE_ASYNC;
> - bool deferred_compaction = false;
> + enum compact_result compact_result;
> int contended_compaction = COMPACT_CONTENDED_NONE;
> int no_progress_loops = 0;
>
> @@ -3227,7 +3245,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
> migration_mode,
> &contended_compaction,
> - &deferred_compaction);
> + &compact_result);
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
>
> @@ -3240,7 +3258,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> * to heavily disrupt the system, so we fail the allocation
> * instead of entering direct reclaim.
> */
> - if (deferred_compaction)
> + if (compact_result == COMPACT_DEFERRED)
> goto nopage;
>
> /*
> @@ -3294,6 +3312,9 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> did_some_progress > 0, no_progress_loops))
> goto retry;
>
> + if (should_compact_retry(order, compact_result, contended_compaction))
> + goto retry;
> +
> /* Reclaim has failed us, start killing things */
> page = __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_mask, order, ac, &did_some_progress);
> if (page)
> @@ -3314,7 +3335,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> page = __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags,
> ac, migration_mode,
> &contended_compaction,
> - &deferred_compaction);
> + &compact_result);
> if (page)
> goto got_pg;
> nopage:
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 18:19 [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Michal Hocko
2015-12-15 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, oom: rework oom detection Michal Hocko
2016-01-14 22:58 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-16 1:07 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-19 22:48 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-20 11:13 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-20 13:13 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-04 8:23 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-04-04 9:42 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-15 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: throttle on IO only when there are too many dirty and writeback pages Michal Hocko
2016-03-17 11:35 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-17 12:01 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-15 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: use watermak checks for __GFP_REPEAT high order allocations Michal Hocko
2015-12-16 23:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Andrew Morton
2015-12-18 12:12 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-16 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2015-12-18 13:15 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-18 16:35 ` Johannes Weiner
2015-12-24 12:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-12-28 12:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2015-12-28 14:13 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-06 12:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-01-08 12:37 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-29 16:32 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-30 15:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-02 15:47 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-20 12:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-27 23:18 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-28 21:19 ` Michal Hocko
2015-12-29 16:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 20:40 ` [PATCH 4/3] mm, oom: drop the last allocation attempt before out_of_memory Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 21:36 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-28 23:19 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-28 23:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-01-29 10:39 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-29 15:32 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-30 12:18 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-29 15:23 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-29 15:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 21:19 ` [PATCH 5/3] mm, vmscan: make zone_reclaimable_pages more precise Michal Hocko
2016-01-28 23:20 ` David Rientjes
2016-01-29 3:41 ` Hillf Danton
2016-01-29 10:35 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-01-29 15:17 ` Michal Hocko
2016-01-29 21:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-03 13:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Michal Hocko
2016-02-03 22:58 ` David Rientjes
2016-02-04 12:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-04 13:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-04 13:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-04 14:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-07 4:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-15 20:06 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-16 13:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-16 15:19 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-25 3:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-02-25 6:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-25 9:17 ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-25 9:27 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-25 9:48 ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-25 11:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-02-25 9:23 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-26 6:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-02-26 7:54 ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-26 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-26 10:27 ` Hillf Danton
2016-02-26 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-26 9:33 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 21:02 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 2:19 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 13:32 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 14:34 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-03 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-03 10:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-03 14:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-03 15:25 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-04 5:23 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 15:15 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-04 17:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-07 5:23 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-03 15:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-03 16:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-04 7:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 15:01 ` Minchan Kim
2016-03-07 16:08 ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 3:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08 9:08 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 9:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08 9:24 ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 9:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08 9:46 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 9:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 10:10 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 11:12 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 12:22 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 12:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 9:58 ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-03-08 13:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 10:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-08 13:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] oom rework: high order enahncements Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, compaction: change COMPACT_ constants into enum Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 14:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09 3:55 ` Hillf Danton
2016-03-08 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, compaction: cover all compaction mode in compact_zone Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 14:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09 3:57 ` Hillf Danton
2016-03-08 13:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 14:34 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-03-08 14:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 15:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09 11:11 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-09 14:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-11 12:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-11 13:06 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 19:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-14 16:21 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 15:19 ` [PATCH] mm, oom: protect !costly allocations some more (was: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4) Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-08 16:05 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-08 17:03 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-09 10:41 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 14:53 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-11 15:20 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 20:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] OOM detection rework v4 Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 7:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-01 13:38 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 14:40 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-01 18:14 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-02 2:55 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 12:37 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 14:06 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 12:24 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 13:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-02 13:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-02 2:28 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-02 12:39 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-03 9:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-03 12:32 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-03 20:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-04 7:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-04 7:53 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 12:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 10:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-11 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 13:32 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-11 15:28 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 16:49 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-11 17:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-11 17:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-12 4:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-03-13 14:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DEE2FD.4000105@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).