From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"thunder.leizhen@huawei.com" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
dingtinahong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
chenjie6@huawei.com, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Suspicious error for CMA stress test
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:18:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DF87E6.10703@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4MYzJwkBYqDXicA=hCrtapK+tMNZUNaEAQO=74s_mDt4g@mail.gmail.com>
On 2016/3/8 23:36, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 2016-03-08 19:45 GMT+09:00 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>:
>> On 2016/3/8 15:48, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 01:59:12PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>>> On 03/07/2016 05:34 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 03:35:26PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>>>> Sad to hear that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you tell me your system's MAX_ORDER and pageblock_order?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MAX_ORDER is 11, pageblock_order is 9, thanks for your help!
>>>>
>>>> I thought that CMA regions/operations (and isolation IIRC?) were
>>>> supposed to be MAX_ORDER aligned exactly to prevent needing these
>>>> extra checks for buddy merging. So what's wrong?
>>>
>>> CMA isolates MAX_ORDER aligned blocks, but, during the process,
>>> partialy isolated block exists. If MAX_ORDER is 11 and
>>> pageblock_order is 9, two pageblocks make up MAX_ORDER
>>> aligned block and I can think following scenario because pageblock
>>> (un)isolation would be done one by one.
>>>
>>> (each character means one pageblock. 'C', 'I' means MIGRATE_CMA,
>>> MIGRATE_ISOLATE, respectively.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Joonsoo,
>>
>>> CC -> IC -> II (Isolation)
>>
>>> II -> CI -> CC (Un-isolation)
>>>
>>> If some pages are freed at this intermediate state such as IC or CI,
>>> that page could be merged to the other page that is resident on
>>> different type of pageblock and it will cause wrong freepage count.
>>>
>>
>> Isolation will appear when do cma alloc, so there are two following threads.
>>
>> C(free)C(used) -> start_isolate_page_range -> I(free)C(used) -> I(free)I(someone free it) -> undo_isolate_page_range -> C(free)C(free)
>> so free cma is 2M -> 0M -> 0M -> 4M, the increased 2M was freed by someone.
>
> Your example is correct one but think about following one.
> C(free)C(used) -> start_isolate_page_range -> I(free)C(used) ->
> I(free)**C**(someone free it) -> undo_isolate_page_range ->
> C(free)C(free)
>
> it would be 2M -> 0M -> 2M -> 6M.
> When we do I(free)C(someone free it), CMA freepage is added
> because it is on CMA pageblock. But, bad merging happens and
> 4M buddy is made and it is in isolate buddy list.
> Later, when we do undo_isolation, this 4M buddy is moved to
> CMA buddy list and 4M is added to CMA freepage counter so
> total is 6M.
>
Hi Joonsoo,
I know the cause of the problem now, thank you very much.
> Thanks.
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <56D6F008.1050600@huawei.com>
2016-03-03 1:25 ` Suspicious error for CMA stress test Laura Abbott
2016-03-03 6:07 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-03 7:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-03 7:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-03 12:49 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-03 18:52 ` Laura Abbott
2016-03-04 2:09 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 6:09 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-04 2:02 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 4:32 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 6:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-04 6:38 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 7:35 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-07 4:34 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-07 8:16 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-03-07 18:42 ` Laura Abbott
2016-03-08 1:54 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-03-09 1:23 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-03-11 15:00 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-11 17:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-14 6:49 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-14 7:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-14 7:18 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-14 12:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-14 14:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-16 12:03 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-16 9:44 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-17 6:54 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-17 9:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-17 15:31 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-18 2:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-17 15:43 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-17 15:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-18 13:32 ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-21 4:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-22 14:56 ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-23 4:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-18 14:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-18 14:42 ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-18 20:58 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-22 14:47 ` Lucas Stach
2016-03-19 7:24 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-19 22:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-23 4:44 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-23 8:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-23 8:32 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-18 12:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 4:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-07 12:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-08 7:48 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-08 10:45 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-03-08 15:36 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-09 2:18 ` Xishi Qiu [this message]
2016-03-04 5:33 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-08 1:42 ` Xishi Qiu
2016-03-08 8:09 ` Joonsoo Kim
2016-03-04 6:59 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-03-07 4:40 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DF87E6.10703@huawei.com \
--to=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chenjie6@huawei.com \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).