From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp, mlock: update unevictable-lru.txt
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:30:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E82AAE.8090003@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458053744-40664-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
On 03/15/2016 07:55 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> +Transparent huge page is represented by single entry on a lru list and
> +therefore we can only make unevictable entire compound page, not
> +individual subpages.
A few grammar nits:
A transparent huge page is represented by a single entry on an lru list.
Therefore, we can only make unevictable an entire compound page, not
individual subpages.
...
> +We handle this by forbidding mlocking PTE-mapped huge pages. This way we
> +keep the huge page accessible for vmscan. Under memory pressure the page
> +will be split, subpages from VM_LOCKED VMAs moved to unevictable lru and
> +the rest can be evicted.
What do you mean by "mlocking" in this context? Do you mean that we
actually return -ESOMETHING from mlock() on PTE-mapped huge pages? Or,
do you just mean that we defer treating PTE-mapped huge pages as
PageUnevictable() inside the kernel?
I think we should probably avoid saying "mlocking" when we really mean
"kernel-internal mlocked page handling" aka. the unevictable list.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 14:55 [PATCH] thp, mlock: update unevictable-lru.txt Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-15 15:30 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-03-15 15:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-03-15 16:56 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E82AAE.8090003@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).