From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: 'Hugh Dickins' <hughd@google.com>,
'Naoya Horiguchi' <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
"'Kirill A. Shutemov'" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
'David Rientjes' <rientjes@google.com>,
'Dave Hansen' <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@linutronix.de>,
'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@redhat.com>,
"'H. Peter Anvin'" <hpa@zytor.com>,
'Catalin Marinas' <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
'Will Deacon' <will.deacon@arm.com>,
'Steve Capper' <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/hugetlbfs: Attempt PUD_SIZE mapping alignment if PMD sharing enabled
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:29:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56FAAD70.1020806@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <024b01d1896e$2e600e70$8b202b50$@alibaba-inc.com>
On 03/28/2016 08:50 PM, Hillf Danton wrote:
>>
>> When creating a hugetlb mapping, attempt PUD_SIZE alignment if the
>> following conditions are met:
>> - Address passed to mmap or shmat is NULL
>> - The mapping is flaged as shared
>> - The mapping is at least PUD_SIZE in length
>> If a PUD_SIZE aligned mapping can not be created, then fall back to a
>> huge page size mapping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> index 540ddc9..22b2e38 100644
>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>> @@ -175,6 +175,17 @@ hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> struct hstate *h = hstate_file(file);
>> struct vm_unmapped_area_info info;
>> + bool pud_size_align = false;
>> + unsigned long ret_addr;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If PMD sharing is enabled, align to PUD_SIZE to facilitate
>> + * sharing. Only attempt alignment if no address was passed in,
>> + * flags indicate sharing and size is big enough.
>> + */
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE) &&
>> + !addr && flags & MAP_SHARED && len >= PUD_SIZE)
>> + pud_size_align = true;
>>
>> if (len & ~huge_page_mask(h))
>> return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -199,9 +210,23 @@ hugetlb_get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
>> info.length = len;
>> info.low_limit = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
>> info.high_limit = TASK_SIZE;
>> - info.align_mask = PAGE_MASK & ~huge_page_mask(h);
>> + if (pud_size_align)
>> + info.align_mask = PAGE_MASK & (PUD_SIZE - 1);
>> + else
>> + info.align_mask = PAGE_MASK & ~huge_page_mask(h);
>> info.align_offset = 0;
>> - return vm_unmapped_area(&info);
>> + ret_addr = vm_unmapped_area(&info);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If failed with PUD_SIZE alignment, try again with huge page
>> + * size alignment.
>> + */
>
> Can we avoid going another round as long as it is a file with
> the PUD page size?
Yes, that brings up a good point.
Since we only do PMD sharing with PMD_SIZE huge pages, that should be
part of the check as to whether we try PUD_SIZE alignment. The initial
check should be expanded as follows:
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE) && !addr &&
flags & MAP_SHARED && huge_page_size(h) == PMD_SIZE && len >= PUD_SIZE)
pud_size_align = true;
In that case, pud_size_align remains false and we do not retry.
--
Mike Kravetz
>
> Hillf
>> + if ((ret_addr & ~PAGE_MASK) && pud_size_align) {
>> + info.align_mask = PAGE_MASK & ~huge_page_mask(h);
>> + ret_addr = vm_unmapped_area(&info);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret_addr;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> --
>> 2.4.3
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-29 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-29 1:12 [RFC PATCH 0/2] hugetlb: If PMD sharing is possible, align to PUD_SIZE Mike Kravetz
2016-03-29 1:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm/hugetlbfs: Attempt PUD_SIZE mapping alignment if PMD sharing enabled Mike Kravetz
2016-03-29 3:50 ` Hillf Danton
2016-03-29 16:29 ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2016-03-31 2:18 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-03-31 16:45 ` Mike Kravetz
2016-03-29 1:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] x86/hugetlb: " Mike Kravetz
2016-03-29 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-29 17:05 ` Mike Kravetz
2016-03-31 2:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2016-03-31 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-31 16:32 ` Mike Kravetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56FAAD70.1020806@oracle.com \
--to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).