From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CB3C4332F for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BB65F6B0074; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:03:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B3F408E0002; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:03:53 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9B8608E0001; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:03:53 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F6C6B0074 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:03:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577E61410EA for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80161397946.29.E176160 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B6540026 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:03:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669129425; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=In9GuqAn29oXIcP45h0iG42nfIf4b++tYbTcRtB/XTA=; b=UoDFTxlRvUIM05y6A5yE5XXaLyXml2Cxe/arzQDZlxTTH03LIX4fJuqGecGKCSdtWpxTll eTQrSjBNwxzy/eO7lNVPU9AMbvZFYHNy4wCKbGmA5VkBXaTWNgFxvkEJlos+G2BJI9LvnJ J1A4Vg21FuvaOs8zOXXKeoocJNIeCFs= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-567-DgXlyYlPMe64yjemYMDZMg-1; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:03:43 -0500 X-MC-Unique: DgXlyYlPMe64yjemYMDZMg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id a13-20020adfbc4d000000b00241dda05c3dso1574152wrh.17 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:03:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=In9GuqAn29oXIcP45h0iG42nfIf4b++tYbTcRtB/XTA=; b=friEQ8a3se6LJvGL6/o+oSsRiOkyxv9trkrjDwKAyfasbDl6ly0YAgnfQNKjUscne+ wKMVF+EPzw5kRSKsC+lfF+GJWBuyYmnFzQtCNkKeTaKiruFwazTsleQUPaxQ2TF2KCv0 Db/Q+OXUAuNYfNjQWXd+bYBdkaSMpv1grPzxHH3nLRE75TOkt6zBBvV3d0yHb73XuyzZ lgH3OQPJkPr4x7n68uxdnmpEdp1hJYJTamAv/G/vItN9Ujd9CHrDZkA00w39v/b6JEPo 2v/eg4rtoFiXN6Gz+vKkRQMm/luHB6dZOsl6VzymCeslxVZ8LIegH4Jd5GWQkRHM1SCw wAsA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnYVYiG38OrUrpdmNcRSTPcxzDXHKlrQ0rUIk5hOFn4wgHGuvkU +F9OIgwk8fA9l/oriXRUmXB+aznrlZQfIPxeKTynWAuGkXVf/rQzZUXhHaWC8B6zae5XqzcYRSO QceKm+5iDebU= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea4d:0:b0:22e:38b9:5d6d with SMTP id j13-20020adfea4d000000b0022e38b95d6dmr4031731wrn.276.1669129422179; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:03:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf54snVDIVC/Upuxil+entzwHNnXxSae3W9n6F4Fs/sye/XpHsJ2iwBQKe4HoNog5OAYgHNY7A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ea4d:0:b0:22e:38b9:5d6d with SMTP id j13-20020adfea4d000000b0022e38b95d6dmr4031700wrn.276.1669129421815; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:03:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c706:c300:b066:75e3:f1d2:b69b? (p200300cbc706c300b06675e3f1d2b69b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c706:c300:b066:75e3:f1d2:b69b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l13-20020a5d668d000000b00236488f62d6sm14289929wru.79.2022.11.22.07.03.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 07:03:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <56fecbe9-ecf1-bdac-4e05-4767aa9d4386@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:03:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 16/19] mm/frame-vector: remove FOLL_FORCE usage To: Hans Verkuil , Tomasz Figa , Marek Szyprowski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, etnaviv@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jason Gunthorpe , John Hubbard , Peter Xu , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrea Arcangeli , Hugh Dickins , Nadav Amit , Vlastimil Babka , Matthew Wilcox , Mike Kravetz , Muchun Song , Lucas Stach , David Airlie , Oded Gabbay , Arnd Bergmann , Mauro Carvalho Chehab References: <20221107161740.144456-1-david@redhat.com> <20221107161740.144456-17-david@redhat.com> <6175d780-3307-854c-448a-8e6c7ad0772c@xs4all.nl> <6ace6cd4-3e13-8ec1-4c2a-49e2e14e81a6@redhat.com> <4d3ef082-f7b3-2b6e-6fcf-5f991ffe14e9@xs4all.nl> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <4d3ef082-f7b3-2b6e-6fcf-5f991ffe14e9@xs4all.nl> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1669129426; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=msexgRonwOx7N7BcNt7ZAL/iC55R+qKuL6F576bQ3ve5pcmJ4ViDNs3mewvVCcsHjrQf3T 7M+vtqEc2opyapkOjRffe5Oyu9MwDBtU9GQgOLwKhTbpWn4id92vb2Rw/cEUQV5b7aqlKO bRQmN+4+MmjYMGN9Zmp2c5e0u65rIKc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UoDFTxlR; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1669129426; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=In9GuqAn29oXIcP45h0iG42nfIf4b++tYbTcRtB/XTA=; b=vsdAqH49kIY7wcGaEMcC82MYAijP7STZJcCsN8heZDbbUYB2gb9rFmHwJLhuASIzq2lQJW SwW6JKCa5YCN0VeZE+O6eUPYT66Ix0x2QDSPV09EH6M/cS+5Jm/4THLK+cUOg80egSCREf d24cdGonK7uzG4POQzfq/RSxo/lHB7E= X-Stat-Signature: d63jh1se8gw4eubxmyihkt35gey37p1e X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E1B6540026 Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UoDFTxlR; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1669129425-872307 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 22.11.22 15:07, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 11/22/22 13:38, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 22.11.22 13:25, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>> Hi Tomasz, David, >>> >>> On 11/8/22 05:45, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 1:19 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>> >>>>> FOLL_FORCE is really only for debugger access. According to commit >>>>> 707947247e95 ("media: videobuf2-vmalloc: get_userptr: buffers are always >>>>> writable"), the pinned pages are always writable. >>>> >>>> Actually that patch is only a workaround to temporarily disable >>>> support for read-only pages as they seemed to suffer from some >>>> corruption issues in the retrieved user pages. We expect to support >>>> read-only pages as hardware input after. That said, FOLL_FORCE doesn't >>>> sound like the right thing even in that case, but I don't know the >>>> background behind it being added here in the first place. +Hans >>>> Verkuil +Marek Szyprowski do you happen to remember anything about it? >>> >>> I tracked the use of 'force' all the way back to the first git commit >>> (2.6.12-rc1) in the very old video-buf.c. So it is very, very old and the >>> reason is lost in the mists of time. >>> >>> I'm not sure if the 'force' argument of get_user_pages() at that time >>> even meant the same as FOLL_FORCE today. From what I can tell it has just >>> been faithfully used ever since, but I have my doubt that anyone understands >>> the reason behind it since it was never explained. >>> >>> Looking at this old LWN article https://lwn.net/Articles/28548/ suggests >>> that it might be related to calling get_user_pages for write buffers >>> (non-zero write argument) where you also want to be able to read from the >>> buffer. That is certainly something that some drivers need to do post-capture >>> fixups. >>> >>> But 'force' was also always set for read buffers, and I don't know if that >>> was something that was actually needed, or just laziness. >>> >>> I assume that removing FOLL_FORCE from 'FOLL_FORCE|FOLL_WRITE' will still >>> allow drivers to read from the buffer? >> >> Yes. The only problematic corner case I can imagine is if someone has a >> VMA without write permissions (no PROT_WRITE/VM_WRITE) and wants to pin >> user space pages as a read buffer. We'd specify now FOLL_WRITE without >> FOLL_FORCE and GUP would reject that: write access without write >> permissions is invalid. > > I do not believe this will be an issue. > >> >> There would be no way around "fixing" this implementation to not specify >> FOLL_WRITE when only reading from user-space pages. Not sure what the >> implications are regarding that corruption that was mentioned in >> 707947247e95. > > Before 707947247e95 the FOLL_WRITE flag was only set for write buffers > (i.e. video capture, DMA_FROM_DEVICE), not for read buffers (video output, > DMA_TO_DEVICE). In the video output case there should never be any need > for drivers to write to the buffer to the best of my knowledge. > > But I have had some complaints about that commit that it causes problems > in some scenarios, and it has been on my todo list for quite some time now > to dig deeper into this. I probably should prioritize this for this or > next week. > >> >> Having said that, I assume such a scenario is unlikely -- but you might >> know better how user space usually uses this interface. There would be >> three options: >> >> 1) Leave the FOLL_FORCE hack in for now, which I *really* want to avoid. >> 2) Remove FOLL_FORCE and see if anybody even notices (this patch) and >> leave the implementation as is for now. >> 3) Remove FOLL_FORCE and fixup the implementation to only specify >> FOLL_WRITE if the pages will actually get written to. >> >> 3) would most probably ideal, however, I am no expert on that code and >> can't do it (707947247e95 confuses me). So naive me would go with 2) first. >> > > Option 3 would be best. And 707947247e95 confuses me as well, and I actually > wrote it :-) I am wondering whether it was addressed at the right level, but > as I said, I need to dig a bit deeper into this. Cool, let me know if I can help! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb